saltydawg Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 The actions have spurred criticism from both parties in Congress and President Barack Obama. A new CNN/ORC International survey released Sunday indicated that 71% of Americans find the targeting unacceptable. --CNN Nearly 1/3 of the liberals find the targeting acceptable. What is wrong with these people??? - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charloots Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 Nearly 1/3 of the liberals find the targeting acceptable. What is wrong with these people??? they're liberals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamakatsu Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 Nearly 1/3 of the liberals find the targeting acceptable. What is wrong with these people??? What do people who don't pay taxes care about being targeted by the IRS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charloots Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 What do people who don't pay taxes care about being targeted by the IRS? good point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saltydawg Posted May 20, 2013 Report Share Posted May 20, 2013 What do people who don't pay taxes care about being targeted by the IRS? They want to see the enemy punished, too. - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddy Posted May 27, 2013 Report Share Posted May 27, 2013 oh yeh Benghazi attacks wasn't that around the time when we found out the Obama doesn't really have a daily security briefing, and instead just reads (allegedly) what gets sent to his ipad? "Ok, Eddy you were right" - minivin5 "Oddly enough, Eddy is right fairly often"- TimS "Eddy is correct" - TomT "Say what you will about Eh-ddy but he actually does know a few things." - The Commish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John M Posted May 27, 2013 Report Share Posted May 27, 2013 They want to see the enemy punished, too. by enemy you mean the productive? gotta punish them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nessmuk Posted May 27, 2013 Report Share Posted May 27, 2013 See how stupid that sounds? Well, since you asked... Couple of things in the interest of accuracy. Maybe you weren't an adult for 911 and don't recall, but at the time, there was a fair amount of uncertainly that it was state-sponsored, and thus a more conventional act of war. Later though, the term war still works fine, so it's kind of a dumb comparison. Second, there was no attempt to spin the event to influence a Presidential election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamakatsu Posted May 27, 2013 Report Share Posted May 27, 2013 ...Second, there was no attempt to spin the event to influence a Presidential election. supercut.org/video/362 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nessmuk Posted May 28, 2013 Report Share Posted May 28, 2013 supercut.org/video/362 Gami I know you're smart enough to see the difference between the two. Your video doesn't show me any attempt to spin the truth. Standard exploitation of events, yes, shaping the truth, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamakatsu Posted May 28, 2013 Report Share Posted May 28, 2013 Gami I know you're smart enough to see the difference between the two. Your video doesn't show me any attempt to spin the truth. Standard exploitation of events, yes, shaping the truth, no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nessmuk Posted May 28, 2013 Report Share Posted May 28, 2013 And the politicians are disgusting. Really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamakatsu Posted May 28, 2013 Report Share Posted May 28, 2013 Second, there was no attempt to spin the event to influence a Presidential election. There was no attempt to connect 9/11 to Iraq? While Bush never actually said there was a connection, he certainly insinuated it and Cheney did indeed attempt to connect them. They were successful at it too. A good chunk of Americans still think that Saddam was involved in the attacks and at one time, it was a majority of Americans. It's water under the bridge now, but manipulating talking points following politically hot events is nothing new at all. Doesn't make it ok, but it doesn't rise the level of a scandal, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dena Posted May 28, 2013 Report Share Posted May 28, 2013 No worries now about Benghazi now. It is on the back burner....The IRS, and Press scandals are the big ones now. These other two scandals potentially reach out and touch every citizen...Not some poor dead Ambassador in some remote country. The Republicans will keep Benghazi on the back burner for now...Maybe that's what Obama wanted all along. Material abundance without character is the path of destruction. -Thomas JeffersonThere are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. -Soren Kierkegaard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnmagician Posted May 28, 2013 Report Share Posted May 28, 2013 Quote: Originally Posted by dena No worries now about Benghazi now. It is on the back burner....The IRS, and Press scandals are the big ones now. go figure...... "Hey this one is getting traction, lets drop the REALLY stupid stuff" Eggy 10-13 LAA 7-14 50-50 2-15 "I asked my daughter to send Barron Trump a link to this thread. Wouldn’t it be funny if Trump sued FnM for slander". Wayne Tj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.bb0afd128791a8e562a0aef19c7489b1.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to register here in order to participate.
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now