BT758 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Quote: Originally Posted by RCrowley Not true, before you mentioned this I brought the exact incident up is up in the Syia thread. I'v brought up the high casualty rates we are seeing under Obama's leadership in a thread a month or so ago. While all this is going on I ask you why is the president and his admin absolutley silent on afghanistan??? Why is the very same press corp that updated us daily about Iraq casulaties and daily asked the bush admin about Iraq so silent now when it comes to afghansistan when clearly the casualty rates are very high ??? The news you watch is too busy talking about Benghazi. Obama just appointed a new special envoy to Afghanistan last week. Fox must have forgotten to cover that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sudsy Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 I wasn't watching fox when I saw the president at the UN blaming the YouTube video. For all the world to see. Don't bother. You forget he can do no wrong. If the Messiah said it then it has to be true. What a bunch of pathetic sheep. I just wanta play everyday despite small nagging injuries -- and go home to a woman who appreciates how full of crap I truly am. ~ Crash Davis Social Distancing since 1962 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcow? Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 The news you watch is too busy talking about Benghazi. Obama just appointed a new special envoy to Afghanistan last week. Fox must have forgotten to cover that. Yup, she said she is not worried about it. Anything goes wrong she can call Obama for reinforcements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnieB Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 I'm not defending anything. I'm trying to figure out what you guys are enraged about, and why. From what I can tell, you're mad about something being covered up, but you have no idea what it is. Okay, start with this: The administration covered up the fact that these were coordinated Terrorist attacks by lying repeatedly to the American people and claiming that the attack was a result of spontaneous demonstrations protesting some obscure Youtube video. Which leads to an obvious question: Why would an administration touting a decreased Terror threat as a campaign talking point seek to cover up the fact that just weeks before an election claim the attack on Bengazi was not a terrorist attack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BT758 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Quote: Originally Posted by DonnieB Okay, start with this: The administration covered up the fact that these were coordinated Terrorist attacks by lying repeatedly to the American people and claiming that the attack was a result of spontaneous demonstrations protesting some obscure Youtube video. Which leads to an obvious question: Why would an administration touting a decreased Terror threat as a campaign talking point seek to cover up the fact that just weeks before an election claim the attack on Bengazi was not a terrorist attack? "The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. ... No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation." -Barack Obama, the day after the Benghazi attack "No act of terror will dim the light of the values that we proudly shine on the rest of the world, and no act of violence will shake the resolve of the United States of America." -later the same day "I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished." -The next day So he called it terrorism, and also said it was about the video. Not much of a coverup. Maybe he got bad intel. Maybe it's utterly irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveCap Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 About that "unpunished" part. Seems as though those responsible are still roaming Lybia freely. But thank God the YouTube dude is behind bars. Justice indeed. Sorry if I offended anyone for typing "God" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnieB Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 "The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. ... No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation." -Barack Obama, the day after the Benghazi attack "No act of terror will dim the light of the values that we proudly shine on the rest of the world, and no act of violence will shake the resolve of the United States of America." -later the same day "I want people around the world to hear me: To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished." -The next day So he called it terrorism, and also said it was about the video. Not much of a coverup. Maybe he got bad intel. Maybe it's utterly irrelevant. Maybe it's not. We have the right to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finster Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Maybe it's not. We have the right to know. just hold your horses there, Bub. The Obamaphiles will tell you what you have a right to know. Do not question them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishinambition Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 most transparent agency ever. now shut the **** and eat your sprouts. .....it was their final, most essential command Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveCap Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?freewheel=90085&sitesection=breitbart&VID=24806904 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatWhacker X5 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Truth is IMO......the WH and News Media can't report the truth if they wanted to......else they'd be held accountable for much more than just this......and Ms. Clinton is going to make a run fro President......man are we screwed. (*member formerly known as 'Mr. Bigdeal') NON GRATUM ANUS RODENTUM.... "Heaven don't want me and Hell's afraid I'll take over".... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCrowley Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 The news you watch is too busy talking about Benghazi. Obama just appointed a new special envoy to Afghanistan last week. Fox must have forgotten to cover that. I watch PBS . What news outlet did you see this Afghanistan coverage? I'd like to up some more on their coverage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnieB Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Isn't there a law against lying about the facts surrounding a murder after the fact? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BT758 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Quote: Originally Posted by RCrowley I watch PBS . What news outlet did you see this Afghanistan coverage? I'd like to up some more on their coverage PBS is pretty good. They covered it last Friday. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/05/james-dobbins.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cartopper Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 PBS is pretty good. They covered it last Friday. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/05/james-dobbins.html As did Fox News and most other news organizations, http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/03/kerry-names-veteran-diplomat-as-new-afghan-envoy/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fpolitics+(Internal+-+Politics+-+Text) Back to Benghazi . . . The Obama Administration appeared to have intentionally misled the American people about the cause of the terrorists attacking the embassy, not just a simple "act of terror", and not allowing Special Operations to engage and assist those under attack from Terrorists and not protestors. Don't you want to know the truth? If it were your family member, would you not want accountability. Or was it "a long time ago" or "what difference does it make"? This administration is shameless. "A perpetual series of occasions for hope" "Starving dogs begging for scraps. The big picture is not important as long as we can get our scraps." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.bb0afd128791a8e562a0aef19c7489b1.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to register here in order to participate.
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now