· #1 Posted November 24, 2022 And of course, once they realize they ****ed up they all conspire to frame him and arrest him for resisting arrest. -1 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #2 Posted November 24, 2022 Damn, Your actually changing my mind about law enforcement!!...........Just kiddin...Your a tool!! Thanks for playing!! 0 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #3 Posted November 24, 2022 Mussa ben da pimp roll yo! 0 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #4 Posted November 24, 2022 Did he resist arrest? Yes or No question 0 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #5 Posted November 24, 2022 Seal in the spirit of Thanksgiving please go **** yourself and die you miserable ****. 8 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #6 Posted November 24, 2022 2 hours ago, Jeff270 said: Did he resist arrest? Yes or No question No, he wasn't under arrest. -2 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #7 Posted November 24, 2022 Was he _resisting_ arrest? The resisting part occurs prior to being under arrest. 0 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #8 Posted November 24, 2022 2 hours ago, Tom T said: Seal in the spirit of Thanksgiving please go **** yourself and die you miserable ****. Took the words right out of my mouth!!!! 0 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #9 Posted November 24, 2022 3 mins ago, Jeff270 said: Was he _resisting_ arrest? The resisting part occurs prior to being under arrest. They use the resisting arrest charge in order to justify injuring someone who was being arrested. He wasn't being arrested. They sicced a dog on him and then tackled him. They didn't have anything to arrest him on, so they just had to go with "resisting arrest" as a standalone charge because he was injured and they had nothing to charge him with. -1 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #10 Posted November 24, 2022 They tried to stop him, while acting under their lawful authority. He resisted. The charge is legitimate. 0 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #11 Posted November 24, 2022 And again, why didn't he just stop and talk to them instead of keep walking away? Good bite 2 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #12 Posted November 24, 2022 6 hours ago, Seal said: And of course, once they realize they ****ed up they all conspire to frame him and arrest him for resisting arrest. I actually watched this one why not it's short and some scrote gets chewed on . How can I say this well GOOD CHEW . Good arrest too should've stopped putting one foot in front of the other, 1 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #13 Posted November 24, 2022 14 mins ago, Jeff270 said: They tried to stop him, while acting under their lawful authority. He resisted. The charge is legitimate. Police need reasonable suspicion that you've committed a crime in order to simply detain you never mind sic a dog on you, tackle you, and arrest you. -1 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #14 Posted November 24, 2022 7 mins ago, redfishkiller said: And again, why didn't he just stop and talk to them instead of keep walking away? Good bite I guess he mistakenly thought that the constitution still existed. -1 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
· #15 Posted November 24, 2022 Just now, Seal said: Police need reasonable suspicion that you've committed a crime in order to simply detain you never mind sic a dog on you, tackle you, and arrest you. The charge of resisting arrest is warranted. The police acted within their legal authority and the subject resisted. As long as they were acting in good faith, whether or not the arrest was legal is irrelevant when it comes to the charge of resisting. Guilty 0 Go to top Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
