Jump to content

The Sussman Trial Thread

Rate this topic


RiverRaider

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, RiverRaider said:

Sussman has plead not guilty to lying to the FBI to conceal the fact he was working on behalf of the Clinton campaign, despite sending a text message to Baker the night before their meeting stating that he wasn’t working on behalf the Clinton Campaign 

 

And then billing the Clinton campaign for his work 

 

How do you think this will go? 
 

 

Is that the correct version of events, or is that  Rick Scott’s Fox News grievance buttpole narrative?

If Sussman found kiddie porn on Trumps server and turned it over to the FBI, and if Sussman told the FBI he was doing it on his own, but also while working for the Clinton campaign but not for the Clinton campaign, would you be arguing Sussman lied to the FBI and the only reason he turned over the evidence of kiddie porn on Trump’s server was to further the Clinton campaign’s goals of smearing Trump?

Substitute bizarre Russian bank traffic and  explain to me how it’s different.

I don’t see the point in Durhams case. At the end of the day Durham’s argument is what, people shouldn’t report crooked looking things to the FBI?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 mins ago, fishhappy said:

Is that the correct version of events, or is that  Rick Scott’s Fox News grievance buttpole narrative?

If Sussman found kiddie porn on Trumps server and turned it over to the FBI, and if Sussman told the FBI he was doing it on his own, but also while working for the Clinton campaign but not for the Clinton campaign, would you be arguing Sussman lied to the FBI and the only reason he turned over the evidence of kiddie porn on Trump’s server was to further the Clinton campaign’s goals of smearing Trump?

Substitute bizarre Russian bank traffic and  explain to me how it’s different.

I don’t see the point in Durhams case. At the end of the day Durham’s argument is what, people shouldn’t report crooked looking things to the FBI?



It was a hoax 

There wasn’t anything crooked 

Do you know anything about this at all?! 
 

Your post is borderline gibberish 
 

 

 

 

A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. – William James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 mins ago, fishhappy said:

Is that the correct version of events, or is that  Rick Scott’s Fox News grievance buttpole narrative?

If Sussman found kiddie porn on Trumps server and turned it over to the FBI, and if Sussman told the FBI he was doing it on his own, but also while working for the Clinton campaign but not for the Clinton campaign, would you be arguing Sussman lied to the FBI and the only reason he turned over the evidence of kiddie porn on Trump’s server was to further the Clinton campaign’s goals of smearing Trump?

Substitute bizarre Russian bank traffic and  explain to me how it’s different.

I don’t see the point in Durhams case. At the end of the day Durham’s argument is what, people shouldn’t report crooked looking things to the FBI?

Still looking for Hunters lap top = FBI :laugh:

  If it has fins i want to catch it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 mins ago, BrianBM said:

The charge is relatively minor, and the trial is just started. And it's hard to compete with a war for front-page space.

The war hardly gets mentioned lately…..other than money. Inflation and baby formula are the headlines. 

“Shall not be infringed” was the “talk to the hand” of that period. (Me 2022)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 mins ago, fishhappy said:

 

…kiddie porn

It’s scaring me that when searching for a hypothetical example your brain went straight to this……..

“Shall not be infringed” was the “talk to the hand” of that period. (Me 2022)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 mins ago, EBHarvey said:

 

Really?  You don't?

We're on the cusp of a legitimate mass brain washing epidemic similar to the Germans.

30 mins ago, fishhappy said:

Is that the correct version of events, or is that  Rick Scott’s Fox News grievance buttpole narrative?

If Sussman found kiddie porn on Trumps server and turned it over to the FBI, and if Sussman told the FBI he was doing it on his own, but also while working for the Clinton campaign but not for the Clinton campaign, would you be arguing Sussman lied to the FBI and the only reason he turned over the evidence of kiddie porn on Trump’s server was to further the Clinton campaign’s goals of smearing Trump?

Substitute bizarre Russian bank traffic and  explain to me how it’s different.

I don’t see the point in Durhams case. At the end of the day Durham’s argument is what, people shouldn’t report crooked looking things to the FBI?

This guy might not be brainwashed, just a...

"all of jase's posts are valid." -Otter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 mins ago, JaseB said:

We're on the cusp of a legitimate mass brain washing epidemic similar to the Germans.

This guy might not be brainwashed, just a...

How do you know this isn’t Durham’s concoction, leaked to the press, creating a narrative to justify one of the most abysmal special counsel investigations in doj history?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fishhappy said:

Let’s put it this way, Is Durham saying the evidence of a connection between Russian Alfa Bank and a Trump Tower server fake?


No… but the FBI and the CIA did 

A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. – William James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...