flyangler Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 (edited) So two things happened this weekend, both showing coordination. First, Biden, Harris, other Dems and the DEMedia are trying to redefine what "packing the courts" means in the current environment. Biden said it yesterday: what Trump is trying to do, fill a vacancy on the 9-member SC, is actually an attempt to "pack the court". That flies in the face of historical meaning (see FDR's attempt to pack the SC to preserve his New Deal plans the Court was disallowing) and 90 years of colloquial usage. Even better, Biden said yesterday that Trump's effort to place ACB on the SC is "unconstitutional", even though it is not. So Biden won’t address whether he would actually pack the Court in the classic definition, but he is gaslighting Trump for doing what’s been done 29 times in history. And the DEMedia not only won’t call out Biden on his rhetoric, they adopt his language, or he’s adopting theirs. Just seems all too coordinated to be happenstance. Second, the Media and Dems are now trying to not only move the definition of "Court packing" but they are trying to reduce the meaning and import of any attempt to EXPAND THE COURT". As if overnight, a new term, "depoliticizing" has entered the current lexicon with a meaning that is a perversion of the use of "de" as in undo as a prefix for "politicizing". Increasing the size of the Court, not attempted since FDR's failed attempt in the 1930s, is the ULTIMATE political acts and would politicize the Court in ways unimaginable. Another entry into the progressive NewSpeak dictionary. ‘Americans aren’t idiots!’ The AP’s use of ‘Democrats’ language’ to explain ‘packing the court’ doesn’t go well Posted at 2:09 pm on October 11, 2020 by Jacob B. Since the Associated Press considers itself “an independent global news organization dedicated to factual reporting,” it would be problematic for an AP article to contain commentary packaged as news and facts. Real Clear Politics co-founder and president Tom Bevan captured the following excerpt from an AP story. “Bullock said that if Coney Barrett was confirmed, he would be open to measures to depoliticize the court, including adding judges to the bench, a practice critics have dubbed packing the courts.” The latest version of the article contains the following note: “This story has been edited to make clear that it is Bullock’s opinion, rather than a fact, that adding justices to the Supreme Court would depoliticize the court.” To call increasing the number of Supreme Court justices “depoliticizing” would be an egregious political overstatement if made by a Democrat politician, much less a news organization. Also, “packing the court” is not a phrase recently invented by opponents of the Democrats’ desire to increase the number of justices. Americans need a news media that will tell us what’s going on without telling us how to react. *** Edited October 12, 2020 by flyangler Ellar 1 “No nation in history has survived once its borders were destroyed, once its citizenship was rendered no different from mere residence, and once its neighbors with impunity undermined its sovereignty.” - Victor Davis Hanson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcow? Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 I'm not going to "pack the court" I'm simply going to politicize it in my favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishy Fisher Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 Thankfully, there's 0% chance that senile pedophile can win. Rickman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonbat Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 Frank Luntz ought to be proud at the Orwellian attempt to sanitize what they may do. "My brain hurts!" - Mr. Gumby "Then it will have to come out!" - The Brain Specialist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nessmuk Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 It is tragic that so many Americans are dumb enough to buy this. Tragic. Gotcow?, JimG, Rickman and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcow? Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 Just now, Fishy Fisher said: Thankfully, there's 0% chance that senile pedophile can win. If you think that, it is you that is senile....... makorider 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishy Fisher Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 8 mins ago, Gotcow? said: If you think that, it is you that is senile....... Not think. Know. As in, only the senile and insane could possibly believe otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcow? Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 Just now, Fishy Fisher said: Not think. Know. As in, only the senile and insane could possibly believe otherwise. You don't know squat. The moment Covid collapsed the economy Trump was in danger of losing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santiago II Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 6 mins ago, Gotcow? said: You don't know squat. The moment Covid collapsed the economy Trump was in danger of losing. When you've got the MSM, the entertainment industry, tech oligarchs, and the DC swamp controlling most of our information resources, anything is possible. JimG and RonG 2 Laus Deo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 (edited) AP no longer stands for Associated Press Going forward it now stands for Arse-Holes Politicized This is fun, what else can we redefine? Edited October 12, 2020 by J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishy Fisher Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 38 mins ago, Gotcow? said: You don't know squat. The moment Covid collapsed the economy Trump was in danger of losing. Nope. Every conceivable metric points to a Trump win. Not including fake polls. By enthusiasm, by merchandise sold, by boat parades, by the number of yard signs, by every measure, Trump has it in the bag already. You're not looking at the big picture, and hence, you don't know squat about squat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcow? Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 Just now, Fishy Fisher said: Nope. Every conceivable metric points to a Trump win. Except the one metric that would have insured Trump's win. The economy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishy Fisher Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 1 min ago, Gotcow? said: Except the one metric that would have insured Trump's win. The economy. Nobody blames Trump for the democrats shutting down the economy over the hoax virus. Get real. It's not year zero and it certainly isn't month zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyangler Posted October 12, 2020 Author Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 Ellar 1 “No nation in history has survived once its borders were destroyed, once its citizenship was rendered no different from mere residence, and once its neighbors with impunity undermined its sovereignty.” - Victor Davis Hanson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
makorider Posted October 12, 2020 Report Share Posted October 12, 2020 2 hours ago, Fishy Fisher said: Thankfully, there's 0% chance that senile pedophile can win. If only that were true. Don't kid yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to register here in order to participate.
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now