RJ

Worst than Watergate Obama Coup Leader

Rate this topic

36 posts in this topic

It Was Obama All Along.  Worse than Watergate: Part 3.

by JED BABBIN June 29, 2020, 12:03 AM

 

The publication of a set of notes taken by now-disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok related to the prosecution of former national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn provides the first specific evidence that former President Obama was behind the wrongful prosecution of Flynn and, almost certainly, the investigation of Donald Trump’s campaign and presidential transition.

 

Strzok took the notes at a January 5, 2017, White House meeting at which he, Obama, Joe Biden, then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, then-FBI Director James Comey, and Susan Rice, Obama’s national security adviser, all were present.

 

The notes recount part of the conversation as follows:

 

Rice-Comey-Yates: [Flynn cuts] Other countries …

 

(Note: this probably means they listened to partial recordings of the Flynn–Kislyak conversations)

 

 

Comey-Yates: lean forward on [unclass?] Biden: “Logan Act”

Obama: These are unusual times.  Biden: I’ve been on the intel cmte for ten years and I never…

 

Obama: Make sure you look at things + have the right people on it.  Obama: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling transition team?

 

Comey: Flynn – Kislyak calls but appear legit

 

Obama directs the investigation of Flynn to proceed. He doesn’t say, “Have your best people on it”; he says, “have the right people on it,” which means something entirely different: have politically reliable people investigate Flynn. Obama directed Yates and Comey to have people who could be relied on to pursue Flynn perform the investigation.

 

The next relevant meeting we know about is the one that took place on January 23, 2017, after Trump’s inauguration and long after Comey told Obama that the Flynn–Kislyak conversations appeared to be legitimate. Bill Priestap, then the FBI’s head of counterintelligence, made the notes of that meeting either during or after it. The meeting was between Comey, then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and himself.

 

Priestap’s notes recall conversations in which the three apparently decided to not warn Flynn of his constitutional rights or that there was a risk of Flynn being prosecuted for lying to the FBI.

 

Priestap’s now-famous notes say, “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired? … If we get him to admit to breaking the Logan Act, give facts to DOJ + have them decide.”

 

Comey, Priestap, and McCabe were following Obama’s orders and setting up the interview to entrap Flynn into lying or admitting a violation of the Logan Act, the 1807 law precluding American citizens who lack governmental authority from negotiating policy matters with representatives of foreign governments.

 

Comey had already determined that the Flynn–Kislyak conversations appeared to be legitimate. There is absolutely no doubt about their legitimacy: Flynn, as incoming national security adviser to the already-elected Trump, would be highly derelict in his duty if he hadn’t had such conversations with Kislyak and a wide variety of foreign government representatives on any subject relevant to Trump’s concerns.

 

 

But the investigation continued, the FBI interviewed Flynn on the record and, after the investigation was continued by special counsel Robert Mueller and his team of partisan Democratic prosecutors, Flynn pleaded guilty rather than have Mueller persecute Flynn’s son.

 

Go back to the meeting with Obama, Biden, Yates, Comey, and Rice. This wasn’t an extraordinary event. It was a routine event for the president to be briefed on a counterintelligence investigation.

 

What made it unique is — as Obama noted — these were unusual times.

 

The Flynn investigation “Crossfire Razor” was nothing more than an offshoot from original “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation into Trump’s campaign. We have, as yet, no proof that Obama was directly involved in and directed the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation. But think about the people who ran it: CIA Director John Brennan, Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. There is zero chance that the three ran “Crossfire Hurricane” without Obama’s knowledge. And there is no reason to believe that he was more reluctant to issue them orders on how to conduct that investigation than he was to direct Comey and Yates to investigate Flynn and “put the right people” on it despite the obvious legitimacy of Flynn’s actions.

 

For those who have forgotten, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s surveillance warrants against Carter Page — all four of them — were based on the fictitious “Steele dossier,” the compilation of opposition research materials paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

 

Which brings us around to the January 6, 2017, declaration by the Director of National Intelligence that the entire U.S. intelligence community (IC) that the Russian interference in the 2016 election was intended to benefit candidate Trump.

 

We know now — and the intelligence community knew then — that the Steele dossier was a product of Russian intelligence activities. Steele had based his series of memos on Russian sources. But the IC was determined to defeat Trump and then to disrupt his transition to the presidency. In short, the January 6 declaration was as false as the Steele dossier itself.

 

It’s a great pity that you can’t impeach someone who is no longer in office, because Obama’s actions — clearly in violation of the law and of the constitutional rights of Flynn, Trump, Carter Page, and others — were entirely worthy of impeachment.

 

During the Watergate investigation of President Richard Nixon’s actions, Sen. Howard Baker (R-Tenn.) famously asked, “What did the president know and when did he know it?” In the case of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, the question is what did Obama do and when did he do it?

 

So where do we go from here?

 

One trusted source tells me that Susan Rice — she who took to the airwaves and lied about the Benghazi attack on five Sunday news shows and participated in the push to investigate Flynn — is high on Joe Biden’s list of possible vice-presidential running mates.

 

Biden’s participation in the unjustified pursuit of Mike Flynn (of which he says he was aware, but doesn’t admit its illegitimacy) makes him unfit for the presidency. And if he chooses Susan Rice as his running mate and wins the election, we’ll be governed by the two of the worst people. It’s a kakistocracy in the making. END

 

Coup! 

 

Several Somebody’s are going to be indicted and tried for the TREASON Committed by the Obama Admnistration and its Weaponized Departments!

Obama becomes the new Benedict Arnold.  I hope he “Faces both public and private disdain!” And Dies alone deeply in debt.”

“Traitor” scratched on his Tombstone works for me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WaterGate is like a pre-school prank compared to ObamaGate, biggest scandal in American History; goes deeper than wiretapping Drumpf, The Gay Kenyan's first political hit-job was Louis Lerner and the IRS stifling the Tea Party's for "wrong thought."

 

The TDS afflicted are the only ones that think history started in Nov. 2016, pikers.

 

~

 

 

GIF 001.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love stories about the criminality of obama. 

 

So I was wondering, why would obama be so concerned about Gen Flynn ? Why would he order the head of the FBI to unfairly target this particular guy ?

Why was the Vice president involved in this discussion ?

obama had to get Flynn, but why ? 

 

This is the question and it will lead to bigger revelations. I noticed that our commies refuse to acknowledge that the FBI determined early on no crime was committed, and then lied about the evidence, forged evidence, and purposefully withheld evidence. Even though they know all of that, Flynn was horribly guilty in their minds. Could it be that that is the case simply because they refuse to believe that obama was a dirty crook ?

 

I think so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

100% correct but Trump haters, Democrats and the Democrat Party have become so corrupted they now believe the means always justifies end no matter how illegal it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, FishinMortician said:

obama had to get Flynn, but why ? 

It was a ISIS JV Squad thing. Flynn new better and disagreed publicly with Big Mike's little bit*h. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

 treason calls with Russia!!!!

Repeat it about 1150 more times and if may come true. doubt it but keep trying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

Obama wiretapped my treason calls with Russia!!!!

 

What treason calls?

 

I know your just clowning around... but you sound like a moron 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 mins ago, Dave S said:

Repeat it about 1150 more times and if may come true. doubt it but keep trying. 

If Barr can get Stone and Flynn off on technicalities it makes the treason go away. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 min ago, fish'nmagician said:

If Barr can get Stone and Flynn off on technicalities it makes the treason go away. 

1149 you doing good.  Keep it up. :th:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.