dena

Impeachment Debunking Thread

Rate this topic

16 posts in this topic

In this thread I would like to discuss the impeachment debunking articles.

We have several threads going, with reporters coming out every day with new stuff.

It is a lot to keep track of, and having it all in one thread will help us have a thread to refer to when the same issues arise again and again.

Here is one discussing some testimony recently released.

Here is a guy testifying on something he is very far removed from, and has no first hand knowledge of.

 

A key Democratic witness against Trump admitted in congressional testimony last month that he was not part of the July 25 phone call between the U.S. and Ukrainian presidents, that he didn’t see a transcript or readout of it until late September when it was declassified and released, and that he has never even spoken to President Donald Trump.

William Taylor, the charge d’affairs of the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, told lawmakers in secret testimony two weeks ago that his opinions about an alleged quid pro quo demanded by Trump were formed largely from conversations with anti-Trump staffers within the diplomatic bureaucracy.

[Y]ou’ve never spoken to Mr. [Rudy] Giuliani?” Taylor was asked.

“No, no,” he replied.

“Has anyone ever asked you to speak to Mr. Giuliani?”

“No,” Taylor said.

“And if I may, have you spoken to the president of the United States?” Taylor was asked.

“I have not,” he said.

“You had no communications with the president of the United States?”

“Correct,” Taylor said.

He also admitted he had never spoken to Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s chief of staff.

When asked who exactly he had spoken to about the brouhaha, Taylor confirmed that his only contacts about the matter were with John Bolton, the former national security adviser who was fired by Trump, Fiona Hill, Alexander Vindman, and Tim Morrison. Both Hill and Vindman are rumored to have been sources for the so-called whistleblower who filed a complaint against Trump in August.

Taylor also testified that his knowledge of the phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymr Zelensky wasn’t first-hand knowledge.

“And this isn’t firsthand. It’s not secondhand. It’s not thirdhand,” Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., said to Taylor. “But if I understand this correctly, you’re telling us that Tim Morrison told you that Ambassador Sondland told him that the president told Ambassador Sondland that Zelensky would have to open an investigation into Biden?”

“That’s correct,” Taylor admitted.

Zeldin noted that the only reference to Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden in Taylor’s opening statement stemmed from that convoluted game of telephone. The New York lawmaker hammered Taylor for relying on third-hand information about the state of mind of an elected official to whom he had never spoken.

“So do you have any other source that the president’s goal in making this request was anything other than The New York Times?” Zeldin asked.

“I have not talked to the president,” Taylor said. “I have no other information from what the president was thinking.”

Under questioning from Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, Taylor also testified that the Ukrainian government wasn’t aware U.S. military funding had been temporarily suspended until late August, and then only after the information was leaked to the news media, meaning an alleged quid pro quo would have been impossible.

“So, if nobody in the Ukrainian government is aware of a military hold at the time of the Trump-Zelensky call, then, as a matter of law and as a matter of fact, there can be no quid pro quo, based on military aid,” Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, said. “I just want to be real clear that, again, as of July 25th, you have no knowledge of a quid pro quo involving military aid.”

“July 25th is a week after the hold was put on the security assistance,” Taylor testified. “And July 25th, they had a conversation between the two presidents, where it was not discussed.”

“And to your knowledge, nobody in the Ukrainian government was aware of the hold?” Ratcliffe asked.

“That is correct,” Taylor responded.

Taylor also testified that he didn’t see any official readout of the July 25 phone call until it was declassified and released by Trump in late September.

“I did not see any official readout of the call until it was publicly released on September 25th,” he said.

Sean Davis is the co-founder of The Federalist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, The Dude said:

Fringe conspiracy wacko thinks he’s debunking when he’s actually bunking. Too funny.

Did you even read it? Where's the bunking? You are such a tool, phony. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

I think it's a LOT like screaming about the Clinton Foundation when the Trump charity is a proven scam.

What are you talking about, psycho.

QPQ or not? simple, and you to losers won't answer. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Dude said:

I've already told you that you are well below the minimum standards for discussion. You're wasting your time. 

Typical cop out. You prove yourself to be a weasel, liar every time.

Trolling loser you are.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

I think it's a LOT like screaming about the Clinton Foundation when the Trump charity is a proven scam.

Hey FnM. There is a Biden QPQ thread ready for your answer.

You ask for a new thread, and I granted your wish. 

You have your chance to be honest and forthright. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly, Barr's refusal to defend the TV president in a press conference is a very bad sign that the evidence is very damning and irrefutable, rising easily to impeachment levels.  Barr is seeing the writing on the wall.  

 

So I'm debunking the debunking

Edited by GeoffT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 mins ago, Rickman said:

Mutt and Jeff polluting another thread. I'm shocked, shocked I say.

I can't let it go sometimes. That is the difference between good and bad. They are so untruthful and full,of shi* and full of themselves. I feel that I derailed it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 mins ago, GeoffT said:

Clearly, Barr's refusal to defend the TV president in a press conference is a very bad sign that the evidence is very damning and irrefutable, rising easily to impeachment levels.  Barr is seeing the writing on the wall.  

 

I don't think anyone is surprised that you fell for that story :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.