Jump to content

Mark Zaid ESQ.

Rate this topic


Flybyme

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, The Dude said:

Not in any manner. The President cannot conduct foreign policy for personal gain. 

being President IS a personal gain.

 

you don't think BJ Clinton or Hussein or Shrub wanted to be President because it added to their resume?

 

and, well, you work out a trade deal or a cease fire agreement in your first term, and people back here look at that and say they'll vote to re-elect that President and they get re-elected.......... that's not personal gain?

"Ok, Eddy you were right" - minivin5
"Oddly enough, Eddy is right fairly often"- TimS

"Eddy is correct" - TomT

"Say what you will about Eh-ddy but he actually does know a few things." - The Commish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am thinking a mansion on Martha's Vineyard after 8 years of a Presidential salary speaks pretty loudly to personal gain.  No?

"He's a good stick" - Mr. Miyagi"  ~  "Yep!" - Captain Dingo

"How are you doing that" - Jimmy the Mate  ~  "Shipwreck is one of those guys!" - Capt. Freddy Gamboa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest that this is evidence of the motivation of our secret WB. An Obama plant inside the White House designed to create havoc and damage the president any way he can. This impeachment is pure political theatre and is literally coming apart at the seams.

 

Usually the commies just hate our choice of president. Why was it necessary that this one be taken out ? Seems a decision to do so was very important, very early on. A coordinated effort involving multiple agencies and big media, all working towards the goal of impeaching this man from the moment he won the election. So what are they so afraid that he will do ?

 

Easy answer is......expose their criminal enterprise. They are actually playing defense with these things. The WB was in the White House under the leadership of Obama, and likely knew about some of the things that were being done. For all we know he might be culpable for some of the Spygate stuff.

 

The taint of Obama’s corruption still stinks to high heaven and we need more than just a quick spray of Fabreeze here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now we are learning why the WB must be protected. Can’t have people asking uncomfortable questions in the middle of a political witch hunt. Yes, the truth is coming out now despite the secrecy of the process. Schifty also admitted that he had mislead people bout his personal involvement. 
 

This might indeed be over by Thanksgiving as promised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 mins ago, jkrock said:

Team Swalwell claim to be introducing legislation making it a crime to out a whistleblower. 

 

Man, these Dems  hate the constitution and show open contempt for it

-

Whilst hiding behind it, tearing it apart little by little as they pretend to care and quote the Founding Fathers, traitorous scum the whole lot of them.

"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be something in the blue kool aide

 

Quote

Mark Zaid, the attorney for the Ukraine call whistleblower, on Thursday defended a series of tweets from 2017 in which he predicted a "coup" against President Trump and promised to “get rid of him” -- saying in a statement the tweets referred to “a completely lawful process.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jkrock said:

This attorney has no children and loves disney movies.  He seems to watch them to creep on the little girls.  Democrat.  Does he know Bull Clinton?

-

He looks like a bottom for sure...no that there's anything wrong with that...

"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...