Seal

Inspector general report shows at least 16 officers involved in cover-up of Laquan McDonald shooting

Rate this topic

15 posts in this topic

Quote

 

CHICAGO — An internal report investigating 16 police personnel involved in covering up the 2014 fatal shooting of Laquan McDonald by a former Chicago police officer was released Wednesday after being kept secret for almost three years.

 

The formerly confidential report, written in 2016 by the city of Chicago's inspector general, Joseph Ferguson, revealed that several officers committed numerous ethical and internal violations in order to cover up former officer Jason Van ****’s shooting of the 17-year-old, including giving false statements “to exaggerate the threat McDonald posed.”

 

According to the report, Anthony Wojcik, a former Chicago Police Department lieutenant who was at the scene, improperly disposed of three original general progress reports containing detectives’ handwritten notes of the statements three civilian witnesses made the night of the shooting. He then "personally recreated the reports," before disposing of the original notes, the investigation showed.

 

The report also revealed that at least two officers, who were not fired after the inspector general’s investigation, untruthfully claimed they heard Van **** tell McDonald to drop a small weapon he was holding, and that the teen repeatedly ignored the officers' calls to stay down.

The false statements served to "mischaracterize the events leading up to the McDonald shooting, and to thereby bolster a false narrative which might offer justification for the shooting," the report said.

 

The report found that the officers not only fabricated the details, but that they would also not have been able to hear any interaction between Van **** and McDonald from where they were standing during the encounter.

 

At least four officers who were present the night of the shooting failed to “visually and audibly record events” with in-car video systems, and were found to withhold and shield video evidence establishing what actually transpired between Van **** and McDonald, according to the report.

The inspector general recommended the firing of 11 individuals, but only four were let go, according to the NBC affiliate WMAQ.

None of the four officers fired by the police board were charged criminally. However, they were stripped of police powers and assigned to desk duty as their case proceeded, The Associated Press reported.

 

Former Sgt. Stephen Franko, who was fired for his role in the cover-up, was found to have reviewed and approved false reports submitted by Van **** and his partner regarding the night of the shooting.

 

Franko’s endorsement of those false statements "served to establish the false narrative that McDonald initiated an attack on Van ****,” the report stated.

The report also detailed how Van **** tried to cover facts and did not openly comply with an investigation by the inspector general.

“Van **** made numerous false statements and material omissions in his interviews with CPD and [the Independent Police Review Authority] regarding the McDonald shooting," the report said. In addition,Van **** made "false reports, false statements, and material omissions" to exaggerate the danger he faced with McDonald.

 

IPRA has now been replaced by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability.

"Van **** failed to cooperate with the OIG’s investigation, after being properly called upon to do so and in direct violation of a superior’s order, by refusing to answer OIG’s questions in his interview.”

 

Van **** was found guilty of second-degree murder in 2018 for shooting McDonald 16 times.

 

Van ****’s partner, another officer and a detective were accused of engaging in a cover-up of the events of that evening and put on trial last year but were found not guilty.

The investigative report’s release was vehemently opposed by The Fraternal Order of Police who wanted to keep it under wraps.

 

“The Fraternal Order of Police has articulated in several instances our strongly-held belief that the Inspector General’s office, particularly under Joe Ferguson, is often little more than a political witch hunt of our members, none more so than the manner by which his office generated criminal indictments of the three officers in connection with the Laquan McDonald shooting,” the union said in a statement to the Chicago Sun Times.

 

The report illustrated a massive internal cover-up that was emblematic of a "code of silence" to protect one another within the Chicago Police Department, as previously documented by the Department of Justice in a separate report.

McDonald’s shooting ignited major protests throughout Chicago and become a key catalyst for police accountability not only in the city but also across the country.

 

The inspector general report was kept confidential under city law until Chicago passed an ordinance supported by Mayor Lori Lightfoot authorizing its release to the public last month.

 

The new ordinance stated that reports that involve “sustained findings regarding conduct that either is associated with a death or is, or may be, a felony as defined in the Illinois Criminal Code and is of a compelling public interest" should be make public.

 

Ferguson, who investigated and wrote the report, had long called for its release and fully supported the new ordinance.

“The public doesn’t trust government. And it’s not just Chicago government. It’s government generally," Ferguson said to the Chicago Sun-Times earlier this month. "So, the only way to really have confidence, at least in this generation of things, is to put the information out there.”

 

 

Just one or two bad apples, right? :rolleyes: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 mins ago, DoorGunner said:

Didn't read all of that so I just went to the bottom and now I wonder where you shop? 

The cop lovers claim that there's just a few "bad apple" cops that give the other ones a bad name.

But pretty much without fail, every time a cop commits a crime every other cop helps to cover it up, and helps to frame the victim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 mins ago, HopHead said:

I'd sacrifice my pinkie toe before reading that. 

I'll sum it up for you...

 

If your kid gets attacked by one of those "rare, bad apple cops"...You can count on all the good cops to help frame him for assaulting a police officer. :th: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Seal said:

The cop lovers claim that there's just a few "bad apple" cops that give the other ones a bad name.

But pretty much without fail, every time a cop commits a crime every other cop helps to cover it up, and helps to frame the victim.

Chicago, really?  I would guess theres more then just a few bad apples coming from that dump. And you buy into this crap from a city with more crime then the whole country combined. Nice try, carry on now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 mins ago, fshface said:

Chicago, really?  I would guess theres more then just a few bad apples coming from that dump. And you buy into this crap from a city with more crime then the whole country combined. Nice try, carry on now.

Ok, lets conduct a little test.

 

Name a city...Any city.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.