RiverRaider

Whistle Blower Has "Professional Tie" to Dem 2020 Potus Candidate

Rate this topic

154 posts in this topic

LOL

 

WHO CARES????

 

The summary transcript that Trump released PROVES that what the whistleblower alleges happened........ happened.

 

so it's all about smearing people in the hopes of distracting from Trump's BLATANT abuse of power........

 

you are planting your flag FIRMLY on the wrong side of history here Raider.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

LOL

 

WHO CARES????

 

The summary transcript that Trump released PROVES that what the whistleblower alleges happened........ happened.

 

so it's all about smearing people in the hopes of distracting from Trump's BLATANT abuse of power........

 

you are planting your flag FIRMLY on the wrong side of history here Raider.

 

 

And you would be the first one crying Trump stooge and lackey if it were the other way around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Three sources??

 

Quote

Now, however, there is word of more evidence of possible bias on the whistleblower's part. Under questioning from Republicans during last Friday's impeachment inquiry interview with Atkinson, the inspector general revealed that the whistleblower's possible bias was not that he was simply a registered Democrat. It was that he had a significant tie to one of the Democratic presidential candidates currently vying to challenge President Trump in next year's election.

 

"The IG said [the whistleblower] worked or had some type of professional relationship with one of the Democratic candidates," said one person with knowledge of what was said.

"The IG said the whistleblower had a professional relationship with one of the 2020 candidates," said another person with knowledge of what was said.

 

"What [Atkinson] said was that the whistleblower self-disclosed that he was a registered Democrat and that he had a prior working relationship with a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate," said a third person with knowledge of what was said.

 

All three sources said Atkinson did not identify the Democratic candidate with whom the whistleblower had a connection. It is unclear what the working or professional relationship between the two was.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they time it right, the dems could bring the articles and impeach Trump just before the election without enough time for the Senate to hear it, and they can say that Trump is impeached, and not worry about the silly detail about the Senate clearing him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After decades calling people racists that aren't, thus changing the meaning of the word, Leftists now see what they want to see in words; actual meaning be damned!

 

Both parties suck and are full of self-serving igrates. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

The summary transcript that Trump released PROVES that what the whistleblower alleges happened........ happened.

 

Was it an impeachable offense when Barrack and Joe did it? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, zybathegeek said:

Three sources??

 

 

 

I bet the WB is Cowboy Bob that Liz was playing butt bongo for cash with.

 

He is a pro, and they had a relationship...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since a transcript of the call has been released, I am not sure what a 'whistleblower' adds; unless you believe the transcript is fraudulent.... if thats not the case, it seems like the whistleblower just creates an unnecessary target for the R's to potentially cast doubt on. What am I missing?

 

Also, the Ukraine government is publicly stating that they resumed the investigation into Bursima in March, 4 months before the Trump phone call. Obviously when you investigate a company, you are investigating the executive officers and board of directors. How then is that conversation any more than affirmation/encouragement for something they had already decided to do? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.