RiverRaider

At What Point Does a Nothing-Burger Become a Something-Burger?

Rate this topic

155 posts in this topic

Nothing burger seems to describe corruption by the Republicans,

it becomes a something burger if something similar yet much less significant is done by the Democrats.

 

it's kinda like playing golf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 mins ago, Gotcow? said:

It's a NothingBurger until the Democrats find the balls to Impeach.

the democrats would do a great disservice to our Democracy if they impeached Trump while the Senate is making it clear they have NO intention of dealing with his corruption.

that would essentially green light election meddling to a point where our Republic becomes of a banana variety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

Nothing burger seems to describe corruption by the Republicans,

it becomes a something burger if something similar yet much less significant is done by the Democrats.

 

it's kinda like playing golf.

You're like Joy Behar obsessed with Trump now. Frank O'Donnell. You need a distraction. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

the democrats would do a great disservice to our Democracy if they impeached Trump while the Senate is making it clear they have NO intention of dealing with his corruption.

that would essentially green light election meddling to a point where our Republic becomes of a banana variety.

All they need is proof. Actual, not made up “proof”. You know, to convince the Senate to Impeach. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 mins ago, Mokes said:

You're like Joy Behar obsessed with Trump now. Frank O'Donnell. You need a distraction. 

I think being obsessed with Trump is a patriotic thing to do,

imagine if Germans nipped Hitler's reign in the bud.

 

Trump is acting like an unhinged lunatic,

and Republicans seem to support it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 mins ago, Markushook said:

All they need is proof. Actual, not made up “proof”. You know, to convince the Senate to Impeach. 

proof like a summary of a phone call and admissions by Trump that the summary is accurate?

proof that military aid vital to Ukraine in it's effort to stand up to Russia was being held up so that POTUS could shake them down for political and financial gain?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 min ago, fish'nmagician said:

proof like a summary of a phone call and admissions by Trump that the summary is accurate?

 

Oh no... he asked for an investigation into alleged corruption... heavens... impeach his ass, we don't need none of that investigating corruption nonsense :laugh: 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

proof like a summary of a phone call and admissions by Trump that the summary is accurate?

proof that military aid vital to Ukraine in it's effort to stand up to Russia was being held up so that POTUS could shake them down for political and financial gain?

 

 

The transcript was clean, you know it. The rest is speculation and bull****.

Stop it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 mins ago, fish'nmagician said:

the democrats would do a great disservice to our Democracy if they impeached Trump while the Senate is making it clear they have NO intention of dealing with his corruption.

that would essentially green light election meddling to a point where our Republic becomes of a banana variety.

Lame excuse!

Lamest of Lame excuses.

 

Blame the Republicans for what Democrats will not do.     :dismay:

 

The only reason Republicans are still a viable party is because Democrats are so Lame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is like Dude’s use of “conspiracy theory” or Frank’s charges of failed foreign policy. As I noted several weeks back, you cannot know whether something is a nothing burger, a conspiracy theory or a failed policy until the entire thing has played out. This is like trying to declare the winner of a game before the official play time has expired or you get through the 9th inning. 

 

Mueller was a nothing burger, because he reported nothing of consequence in the end. And when I say consequence, just so Frank does not start listing the “ten examples of obstruction”, consequence means that it led to another action. There is no indictment, no censure and no impeachment follow up action that is coming due to Mueller. That game is done, and it was a nothing burger relative to its expectations. 

 

Is WB1, or even WB2, going to be nothingburger(s)? Time will tell as neither of those have played out as yet. 

 

IG Horowitz? Still too early to declare an NB.

 

Durham? Same.

 

Those who claim some prospective event is going to be a nothingburger are just stating opinions, not facts. Yet, as demonstrated by the OP everyday, his opinions are just as good as facts to him given he sees his own “truth”.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.