flyangler

Progressivism Run Amok: BBC tells kids there are 100 genders

Rate this topic

10 posts in this topic

What can you say other than progressives have gone off the deep end?

 

Some will try to dismiss such things as this as examples of a single person or teacher or school and it is not necessarily applicable more widely. Lefties here have complained about others being "triggered" by nonsense from a single small and isolated incident. Well, how about the official news organization of a leading Western democracy pushing the concept of 100 genders to school children? And without the 9-12 year old kids' parents' consent no less.  

BBC Tells Schoolchildren There Are ‘over 100’ Genders

The British Broadcasting Company (BBC) tells primary schoolchildren that there are over 100 genders as part of its “Teach” video series, which has some concerned parents and observers up in arms.

“You know, there are so many gender identities,” declares the head teacher in response to child’s question. “We know that we have got male and female, but there are over 100, if not more, gender identities now.”

 

The video for schoolchildren aged 9-12 is part of nine new BBC Teach films produced as support material for the personal, social, and health education (PSHE) curriculum in UK schools.

 

Telegraph columnist Celia Walden has written a scathing review of the program, which she calls “noxious nonsense” that poisons children’s minds, a product of the modern “Emperor’s New Clothes gender diversity narrative.”

 

BBC is indulging in the “propagation of misinformation,” Ms. Walden writes, thereby betraying its journalistic duty “to deal not in fads, but facts.”

 

By “willfully warping their minds,” she continues, BBC is contributing to making the new generation of children “as self-obsessed as the supposed grown-ups.”

 

Self-expression no longer means “appreciating individuality and producing something of wider cultural value,” Walden laments, but “folding in on yourself and behaving in an unashamedly selfish way.”

 

“All of which is likely to leave us with a generation of lost, confused and angry young adults asking a question we will find it very difficult to answer: ‘How did you let this happen?’” she writes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are they ?  Which gender is 62?

 

If you are gender 37, do you have a dong, or a goonch?

 

 

 

The Singer Sam Smith bravely came out this past week and said "his pronouns" are  "them they"

 

Questions for the democrats that believe stuff like global warming and this 100 gender stuff?

 

Them means-VERY SPECIFICALLY-2 two people.  Sam Smith believes he is two people, and therefore insane*.

 

Would any dem be willing to turn him in for red flag and have his rights denied?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Or he has some sales issues with his music and is trying a new angle to get to the rubes?

Edited by Little

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only 100 genders? Give them time .....

I have full confidence that the wack-a do's can find at least 50 more genders. Then... like illegals, Dems will find subsidies and free healthcare for them, as they segment out another portion of the population to pander to for votes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

 

There are still only two sexes no matter the number of genders or whatever. 

 

In short gender and sex are not interchangeable and really never have been.

 

And FWIW, up until the 60's or so, gender was rarely if ever used in relation to humans.

 

It was about language.

 

Just saying.

 

But whatever. 

 

Have your the"world is going to hell" moment and be grateful you will likely be dead in 20 or 30 years before you have to endure 250 genders.

Edited by moonbat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 mins ago, moonbat said:

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

 

There are still only two sexes no matter the number of genders or whatever. 

 

In short gender and sex are not interchangeable and really never have been.

 

And FWIW, up until the 60's or so, gender was rarely if ever used in relation to humans.

 

It was about language.

 

Just saying.

 

But whatever. 

 

Have your the"world is going to hell" moment and be grateful you will likely be dead in 20 or 30 years before you have to endure 250 genders.

 

Yeah, we've heard that silly argument a thousand times.  Yeah, we get the difference you're claiming.  Yeah, there's still only two genders.  At least normal ones.  The rest are various shades of "not able to handle reality."

 

Look, if you're in to dresses, we're not going to stop you.  Have at it.  Just don't tell us we have to pretend you're not a weirdo man in a dress.  Because calling you a woman, well, that would be a lie.  Your problem, you deal with it.  And if the rest of the emotional enablers out there can't deal with it, too bad.

Edited by Nessmuk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The basic argument is "gender" is now a meaningless word... which is cool because until the 60's is was meaningless.  So we had a few decades of fun and now the cool kids have ruined the party.

 

However, I missed the part about gender being not used for humans.  What was it used for... plants?  Germs?  Mountains?

Edited by hamlet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Progs are winning the battle of confusing an entire generation.

Starts out with little things, nothing to see here and it snowballs into subjects like this. Bad media, bad politicians, bad parents, bad teachers. 

Accountability and practical thinking are not the standard anymore. Group think and media blitz' are common place for the 20 year old and under kids. Individuality and character are being replaced with homophobe and racist. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.