Flybyme Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 Just now, The Dude said: I have no doubt that you will side with your conspiracy theory buddy. Did team Muller violate Brady? * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 We've been through this many times before. I don't answer your questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flybyme Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 Yes or No My Dude get on the record, and take off the pink hat........... * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 1 min ago, The Dude said: We've been through this many times before. I don't answer your questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiverRaider Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 2 mins ago, The Dude said: I have no doubt that you will side with your conspiracy theory buddy. You wouldn't expect me to side with you nutz would you? A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. – William James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flybyme Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 2 mins ago, The Dude said: We've been through this many times before. I don't answer your questions. because you look foolish every time My Dude................. * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 As I said, you're batchit crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flybyme Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 1 min ago, The Dude said: As I said, you're batchit crazy. and far more intelligent then you obviously.............. * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 29 mins ago, Flybyme said: and far more intelligent then you obviously.............. Pizzagate is real! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dena Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 Fox News RUSSIA INVESTIGATION Published September 11, 2019 Former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s legal team charged in court Tuesday that the Department of Justice cleared Flynn of being a Russian agent in a memo as far back as January 2017 — but that prosecutors still haven't produced the document. The claim came as Flynn's lawyers said in a status conference in a Washington, D.C., courthouse that they are now seeking to have the case against him thrown out, accusing the prosecution of "egregious conduct and suppression” of possibly exculpatory evidence. “We've ... learned that there was a letter dated January 30th, 2017, or an internal memo from the Department of Justice, that completely exonerates Mr. Flynn of being an agent of Russia, and that document has not been produced to us yet," lawyer Sidney Powell said, according to a transcript of Tuesday's hearingobtained by Fox News. FLYNN LEGAL TEAM ACCUSES PROSECUTORS OF MISCONDUCT Powell continued: "So they had a lot of information that they didn't disclose. They also have knowledge of a letter from the British Embassy that completely discredits [Trump dossier author] Christopher Steele and undoes the whole Steele dossier debacle." Continue Reading Below Fox News learned about the memo's existence last week. Asked by Fox News earlier this week if they were aware of the memo and could provide it, a DOJ official said they would try to identify it. But responding to Powell's concerns in court on Tuesday, a government lawyer said they were irrelevant, noting they did not accuse Flynn of being a Russian agent in the first place, according to the transcript. Former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn leaves the federal courthouse in Washington on July 10, 2018. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File) "The government has not alleged in any filings in this court or before the court that the defendant is an agent of Russia. That is not part of this case. That is not part of the act that he has pled guilty to. It was lying to the FBI about particular communications involving Russia, not being an agent of Russia," prosecutor Brandon Van Grack said. As Van Grack noted, Flynn was charged – and dismissed from the Trump administration – for misleading statements about his conversations with then-Russian ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak. But new developments raise questions over the underlying offense that formed the basis for the initial FBI and DOJ investigation into Flynn. Aside from Powell's latest claims in court, Fox News reported on Monday that then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the White House in early February 2017 that the bureau was not considering Flynn for a potential Logan Act prosecution over contacts with the Russian ambassador before Donald Trump was sworn in as president. McCabe was referring to the rarely prosecuted 200-year-old statute that bars American citizens from engaging with a foreign government without authorization from the current U.S. government. The records also indicated that Flynn reported, on two separate occasions, in the days leading up to his White House firing, that FBI agents told him the bureau investigation was over or being closed out. Then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe appears before a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, on Capitol Hill, on June 7, 2017. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) Flynn was never charged with improperly communicating with Kislyak, but in December 2017 pleaded guilty to a single count of making false statements as part of a plea deal with prosecutors. Powell remarked later on Tuesday at the hearing: "There never would have been a plea to begin with if the government had met its Brady obligation disclosing what it knew before Mr. Flynn entered a plea and, frankly, before he even made a proffer." ANDY MCCARTHY: FLYNN SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN PROSECUTED The "Brady material" complaint is in reference to the Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, which established the government's obligation to turn over all exculpatory evidence. The accusation came as both sides have squabbled over a sentencing date. Flynn's defense team also wants all the documents surrounding the FBI’s interview of Flynn. Prosecutors claim they already turned all those documents over to Flynn's team prior to the plea deal. The government has "provided all drafts of that interview report of which it is in possession," prosecutors said Tuesday. Video Prosecutors, Flynn's attorneys say the former national security adviser has completed government cooperation A five-page status report shows a lot of daylight remains between former national security adviser Michael Flynn's new legal team and the government; chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge reports from Washington. Powell also suggested there is another document that hasn't been released. "It would be in the FBI computer system," Powell said. Powell additionally told the court there is evidence that Flynn passed a polygraph test. "There is just a plethora of information out there that we need the actual documents to support and the notes to support," she said. After months of delays, though, prosecutors have said they are ready to proceed to sentencing. On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan indicated he would like to set a tentative sentencing date of Dec. 18. "There is far more at stake here than sentencing," Powell said. "There were stunning failures to produce Brady material, going back to July of 2017." Now that Fox is covering it, can the Democrat media be far behind? Material abundance without character is the path of destruction. -Thomas JeffersonThere are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. -Soren Kierkegaard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 45 mins ago, Flybyme said: and far more intelligent then you obviously.............. By a very wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide margin.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 4 mins ago, dena said: On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan indicated he would like to set a tentative sentencing date of Dec. 18. Now that Fox is covering it, can the Democrat media be far behind? No. It's a non-story. Per the judge, they're moving on to sentencing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 2 mins ago, J said: By a very wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide margin.... You guys certainly circle the wagons around your fellow conspiracy theory travelers. Meanwhile, you've posted more fake news to the forum than everyone else combined and Flyby is responsible for the two biggest fail threads in the forum's history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dena Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 5 mins ago, The Dude said: No. It's a non-story. Per the judge, they're moving on to sentencing. In 3 months. In the meantime, the judge is waiting on the hidden evidence. Why wait? He could sentence him tomorrow if it was a slam dunk. Material abundance without character is the path of destruction. -Thomas JeffersonThere are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. -Soren Kierkegaard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiverRaider Posted September 11, 2019 Report Share Posted September 11, 2019 19 mins ago, The Dude said: You guys certainly circle the wagons around your fellow conspiracy theory travelers. More about ribbing you than anything else in reality A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. – William James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to register here in order to participate.
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now