Little

Julian Assange

Rate this topic

39 posts in this topic

11 hours ago, Little said:

Many questions, all of which should be discussed, especially by leftists.

 

Some journalists have said he is not a journalist.  Thats ridiculous.  Defend the statement if you dare.

 

 

He exposed incompetence and hate and incredible criminal behavior at the DNC.  Corrupt as hell.

 

The Dems owe him a debt of gratitude, not scorn.  Question, why dont you dems show him the gratitude he deserves?  It makes it look as if you actually WANTED CORRUPT LEADERS?  Surely thats not the case.  IS IT?

 

 

Democrats, several dems yesterday ran to microphones to say that Julian Assange worked for Russia.  None offered any proof, or evidence.  They just said it.  None of the democrat window licker reporters challenged them.  Not one.

Why did that happen?

Redacted part of mueller report?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems awful suspicious Julian stopped reporting on the corrupt Democrats once Seth got offed.

Just a coincidence?

Wasn't Julian and Bradley the folks that uncovered the prisoner abuses in Iraq, am I misremembering?

If they just exposed our abuses, they did less damage than Leftist hero and traitor Beau Bergdhal, and he was lauded as a hero.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

“if the New York Times, in 1971, could lawfully publish the Pentagon Papers knowing they included classified documents stolen by Rand Corporation military analyst Daniel Ellsberg from our federal government, then indeed WikiLeaks was entitled, under the First Amendment, to publish classified material that Assange knew was stolen by former United States Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning from our federal government.”

Alan Dershowitz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, dena said:

It seems awful suspicious Julian stopped reporting on the corrupt Democrats once Seth got offed.

Just a coincidence?

Perhaps the people providing the information got the message loud and clear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person responsible for stealing the docs was tried, sentenced and sent to jail. And then set free by Obama after paying for his sex change. 

 

Ya can't make this crap up.... 

 

Assange is being sought out to spill the beans on the Obama and Clinton Cabals. 

This is all a show of subterfuge. 

The UK is up to its eyeballs in bed with the cabals. Any other play would have him killed by the Brits to keep him quiet. 

 

 

Edited by J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, fish'nmagician said:

maybe....

as I said I am NOT against whistle blowers,

it's good to out corruption.......

 

but when you see what Wikileaks is an opinion might change....

some people think Snowden is a hero and manning is bad,

some people think the opposite.

 

but Wikileaks in general seems to ONLY want to release information that damages us.

so we need to treat them as such.

 

if you want to blow a whistle, give it to the partisan outlet of your choice,

 

Wikileaks has the reputation as a straightshooter for whistleblowers. That is, the info provided is pure, uncut, unspun whistleblower documentation. 

Now Assange is being charged with conspiracy for asking Manning if there is any more info. As a journalist, isn't that question his job? Isn't it always the last question of a journalist?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.