SallyGrowler

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Rate this topic

71 posts in this topic

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

 

any guesses?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 mins ago, SallyGrowler said:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

 

any guesses?

What's the question?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've read of the NYC ordinance in question, it's a witless bit of harassment.  I will be surprised if the S.C. lets it stand. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

5 mins ago, BrianBM said:

From what I've read of the NYC ordinance in question, it's a witless bit of harassment.  I will be surprised if the S.C. lets it stand. 

If the ruling isn’t unanimous, we will know who the partisan hacks on the court are.

 

 

Edited by jkrock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if "the people" are no longer a "well regulated militia," but are a bunch of Socialist imbeciles that don't even know how to change a flat tire, let alone responsibly handle a firearm?  Should the principle still apply?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

7 mins ago, JoeyZac said:

What if "the people" are no longer a "well regulated militia," but are a bunch of Socialist imbeciles that don't even know how to change a flat tire, let alone responsibly handle a firearm?  Should the principle still apply?

You should worry about you, and let those that can handle it do that.

If you do not want to participate, no one is making you, but let those with the ability and want to be free to do their duty.

Edited by dena

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 mins ago, dena said:

You should worry about you, and let those that can handle it do that.

If you do not want to participate, no one is making you, but let those with the ability and want to be free to do their duty.

 

Well if it's a "duty," shouldn't everyone be required to do it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really doesn't matter to me which one of my rights you wish take.  My rights, my money, my property.  Whatever.  Reach for any of them and you just crossed the line into being an adversary.  You want to take my right to bear arms, you're every bit as bad as the guy that wants my money or my right to speak freely.  That's not my fault, I don't want anything from you but to leave me alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.