JohnP

This will make righties heads explode

Rate this topic

34 posts in this topic

Posted (edited) · Report post

Since gender identity is right up there with the caravan as a looming national crisis

 

the Publication Nature released this editorial

 

 

According to a draft memo leaked to The New York Times, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposes to establish a legal definition of whether someone is male or female based solely and immutably on the genitals they are born with. Genetic testing, it says, could be used to resolve any ambiguity about external appearance. The move would make it easier for institutions receiving federal funds, such as universities and health programmes, to discriminate against people on the basis of their gender identity. 

The memo claims that processes for deciding the sex on a birth certificate will be “clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable”.

The proposal — on which HHS officials have refused to comment — is a terrible idea that should be killed off. It has no foundation in science and would undo decades of progress on understanding sex — a classification based on internal and external bodily characteristics — and gender, a social construct related to biological differences but also rooted in culture, societal norms and individual behaviour. Worse, it would undermine efforts to reduce discrimination against transgender people and those who do not fall into the binary categories of male or female. 

Furthermore, biology is not as straightforward as the proposal suggests. By some estimates, as many as one in 100 people have differences or disorders of sex development, such as hormonal conditions, genetic changes or anatomical ambiguities, some of which mean that their genitalia cannot clearly be classified as male or female. For most of the twentieth century, doctors would often surgically alter an infant’s ambiguous genitals to match whichever sex was easier, and expect the child to adapt. Frequently, they were wrong. A 2004 study tracked 14 genetically male children given female genitalia; 8 ended up identifying as male, and the surgical intervention caused them great distress 

 

????

Edited by JohnP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FAKE NEWS!  Nature is an extension of the lame stream media with overwhelming leftist, stateist, commie and socialist bias!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 mins ago, JohnP said:

By some estimates, as many as one in 100 people have differences or disorders of sex development, such as hormonal conditions, genetic changes or anatomical ambiguities, some of which mean that their genitalia cannot clearly be classified as male or female.

????

 

Nope.  Well, strike that .  They may say "by some esitmates", and some may estimate it, but if you look at the data that came out prior to this being politicized, its more like 1 in 10-20,000.  

 

Some people arent normal.  Hence, the term normal exists. 

 

Help them.  Assist them in making their lives normal.  Dont define them as normal.  They arent.  

charloots and Fishy Fisher like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 mins ago, KnewBee said:

FAKE NEWS!  Nature is an extension of the lame stream media with overwhelming leftist, stateist, commie and socialist bias!  

 

Correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 mins ago, KnewBee said:

FAKE NEWS!  Nature is an extension of the lame stream media with overwhelming leftist, stateist, commie and socialist bias!  

Who wrote the editorial for them?  One of their London editors, or one from NYC or Boston? 

 

Why wouldn't the author take credit for it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really no.  Why would heads explode?.  Its the same chicken poop the cultural marxists hav been pedalling since they pulled the marriage stunt.  

 

 Men are man and women are women.

 

Even vermont (!!) couldnt stomach that crap, and sent that tranny guy walking yesterday.

 

Blather on at your own peril, it makes people think you are insane.

 

latest?cb=20121010201737

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol...that wang is crooked! Is it a boy or a girl?

 

I am on board if you want to acknowledge that gender is a social construct that exists separately from sex...but if you want to conflate the two, you lost me. 

Markushook likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dena said:

I really do not care what gender you claim to be, as we are all supposed to be equal in the eyes of the law.

Just do not expect me to pay for it, or accept it as normal if it is abnormal.

Its just that simple isnt it?

 

NO legislation, no special (or Any) trsnny laws or homolaws or women laws.  Equal.

Markushook likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple answer is "selective service"  . By law only males ( cock and balls ) have to register .

If you are not lawfully identified how does Uncle Sam know otherwise .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.