J

Traitor!
What an Obamanation!

Rate this topic

12 posts in this topic

z.png.dd909d1cb80280621506e6853fbbc474.png

 

Quote

 

A total of $11.9 billion was ultimately paid to Iran, but the details surrounding these payments remain shrouded in mystery, according to Mark Dubowitz, executive director at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

In total, "Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion in cash or in gold and other precious metals," Dubowitz disclosed.

New questions about these payments are emerging following confirmation from top Obama administration officials on Thursday that it was forced to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash prior to the release of several U.S. hostages earlier this year. The administration insisted that cash had to be used for this payment.

Top administration officials were adamant that the cash payments were the best way to ensure that Iran got immediate access to this money due to its ongoing difficulty accessing international funds still sanctioned by the West.

Lawmakers and others are now pressing the administration to disclose how a slew of other payments to Iran were made in the years leading up to the final nuclear accord.

"In July, the Associated Press cited U.S. officials who estimated that Iran ‘brought home less than $20 billion.’ Were these funds repatriated to Tehran in cash or in gold and precious metals? Through the formal financial system? Or through some combination?" Dubowitz asked in his testimony before the House Financial Services Committee.

"The administration should also clarify if the $20 billion dollars is inclusive of the $11.9 billion in [Joint Plan of Action] funds, or if the $20 billion was in addition to the $11.9 billion," he said. "Either way, it is important to understand how funds were sent. The worst-case scenario here is that Iran may have received as much as $33.6 billion in cash or in gold and other precious metals."

At least some of this money was likely sent in cash and other assets, according to Dubowitz.

The Obama administration was forced to disclose on Thursday that current sanctions and banking restrictions prohibited it from transferring funds to Iran via electronic methods.

The cash payment of $1.7 billion earlier this year was the easiest way to ensure Iran got immediate access to the money, according to these officials.

"Iran had to have it in cash," Paul Ahern, assistant general counsel for enforcement and intelligence at the Treasury Department, told lawmakers. "Iran was very aware of the difficulties it would face in accessing and using the funds if they were in any other form than cash, even after the lifting of sanctions."

A cash delivery "was the most reliable way that they received the funds in a timely manner and it was the manner preferred by the relative foreign banks," Ahren said.

Given the situation, it is likely that the multiple past payments to Iran were conducted in a similar fashion, according to Dubowitz.

"If the White House could only send cash to Iran from the start of the JPOA period through the Tribunal payment that could amount to a grant total of 33.6 billion," he said. "Did any of this money go through the formal financial system? If so, the administration is not being truthful about the 1.7 billion. If many billions arrived in Iran on pallets [of cash] this would be a pretty astounding revelation."

Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and expert on rogue regimes, said that cash payments of this nature are "highly irregular."

"There’s no reason it needed to be paid now. After all, successive administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have delayed payments so as to avoid funding Iranian terrorism," Rubin said. "Likewise, if the United States freezes accounts linked to al Qaeda or Hamas, releasing it and saying, ‘It’s their money anyway,’ would not be a tenable explanation. Cash payments are highly irregular."

The Iranians have been clear that they "perceived the payment to be a ransom" despite the administration’s protestations, Rubin explained.

"Not only has the delivery of the millions of dollars been perceived as a ransom, provided as an incentive to seize more hostages …. but because the money was delivered in cash the payment bolstered the strength of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and augmented its ability to finance and conduct terrorism," he said.

 

 

All this from the Administration without scandal.... Go figure! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least I now know the reasoning behind the cash payments being treated like a cartel drug deal.

It is to make things easier in Iran, even though I am still too dense to understand why Iran could not access the cash after the sanctions were lifted.

The only reason there were no Obama scandals was because of a compliant press/propaganda wing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 mins ago, KnewBee said:

"previously frozen by U.S. sanctions"    

 

Oh my, dreadful, the end of the world,  Obama!

 

You should quit now before you really start looking the fool...

 

z.png.d0463204062816c4ac6ec813e846bb1e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 mins ago, J said:

 

You should quit now before you really start looking the fool...

 

z.png.d0463204062816c4ac6ec813e846bb1e.png

Nah,  I will stick with the mockery of the sham of the travesty......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard an interesting point of view in the reasoning to drop out of the Iran deal.

The speaker was saying it was necessary to drop out of the Iran deal before the negotiations with Kim begins so he will not use that weak deal as a framework for his deal.

Now that the Iran deal is off the table, Trump can start from scratch, and drive a much harder bargain without that anchor around his neck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my,  that is the definitive narrative right there!   "Why"?   "Evil lost control"    Ask yourself....    Too funny....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 mins ago, J said:

:hooked:

 

So many gut hooked idiots, it is hard to believe.... :rolleyes: 

50%, or a little more...It is what makes them dangerous.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.