flyangler

Study: Drug Nationalists Into Accepting Refuges

Rate this topic

17 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

From the Progressive perspective, it is thought that most males, irrespective of age, can be seen as defective females and should be forced to feminize through culture, jobs and self-image. We see it all around us in the media, entertainment, schools and government policies. 

 

And in extreme cases, males who exhibit nationalist or xenophobic tendencies are the most defective as well as being potentially immune to the "usual remediation tactics". Thus, if we can't "fix" these deplorable types in the traditional ways, we can drug them into compliance. And what better substance to use but oxycotin, the female childbirth hormone. 

 

No, you can't make this up. A group of American and European researchers are suggesting that it is possible to drug people into compliance with Progressive policies. 

 

Summary of this study: http://www.pnas.org/content/114/35/9314.full.pdf

 

Oxytocin-enforced norm compliance reduces xenophobic outgroup rejection 

 

A group of researchers from Germany and the United States have published a study which concludes that doping ‘xenophobic’ populations with massive quantities of the estrogen-linked hormone Oxytocin will cure nationalism – making native citizens more accepting and generous towards migrants who simply want free handouts from Western taxpayers while Islamic extremists peacefully rape and murder infidels.

 

Accommodating the large influx of migrants not only challenges the humanitarian capacities of European countries but also requires their native populations to adjust to rapid growths in ethnic diversity, religious pluralism, and cultural differentiation. However, the impetus to adapt to changing social ecosystems is susceptible to considerable interindividual heterogeneity. Resistance to this transition often goes along with xenophobic sentiment, and as a consequence, recent elections in Europe have favored populist candidates who have openly expressed xenophobic attitudes toward refugees.

 

As co-author René Hurlemann said in a related study; “Given the right circumstances, oxytocin may help promote the acceptance and integration of migrants into Western cultures.

 

Widely referred to as the ‘love hormone,’ ‘hug hormone,’ and ‘cuddle chemical,’ Oxytocin is secreted from the pituitary gland during sex, childbirth, and lactation – influencing social behavior and emotion. It has been shown to increase romantic attachment and empathy – invoking feelings of relaxation, trust, and psychological stability.

For just €3.11 / day you can destroy your culture! 

 

The study concludes that a combination of oxytocin nasal spray and social pressure from other doped up participants resulted in ‘xenophobic’ test subjects increasing donations to migrants by 74% – jumping from average of €1.79 to €3.11.

 

[O]ur results imply that an OXT-enforced social norm adherence could be instrumental in motivating a more generalized acceptance toward ethnic diversity, religious plurality, and cultural differentiation resulting from migration by proposing that interventions to increase altruism are most effective when charitable social cues instill the notion that one’s ingroup shows strong affection for an outgroup. Furthermore, UNESCO has emphasized the importance of developing neurobiologically informed strategies for reducing xenophobic, hostile, and discriminatory attitudes (47). Thus, considering OXT-enforced normative incentives in developing future interventions and policy programs intended to reduce outgroup rejection may be an important step toward making the principle of social inclusion a daily reality in our societies.

Edited by tomkaz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Start by destroying traditional gender assignments,place tampons in college aged male restrooms,make non binary gender desirable.Male lactation is the pathway to world peace....be the first frat boi to get an oxytocin generator implanted on your chest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crickets from the pinks.  Defend your ideology.  I cant wait to hear it.  Or,,,,,you know the drill,,,,,,,,,denounce.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch commercials closely.  I am pretty keyed into dumb guy husband whose poor wife has to put up with another kid or a big dumb oaf.  But lately I have been noticing that ALOT of men in commercials are skinny pant wearing sissies.  Starting to see it in mainstream, prime time commercials.  They make Pajama Boy look like Connor McGregor.  This attack on men started slowly but is picking up steam big time.

 

Howard Stern says we have to get our male leads from Australia these days cause our stars are not male enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone notice the recent rise of the oxymoronic term "male feminist"? From an article discussing using feminism as a dating strategy among beta males. 

 

IMG_3161.JPG.2b29a52d43b784da066f3173181df157.JPG

 

 

Dearest faithful reader, I’m a man who finds something to dislike about nearly everything and everyone, yet even I find male feminists to be especially grating—they’re perched wayyyy up near the top of my “Don’t Like ’Em” list. The very term “male feminist” seems as masochistically counterintuitive as “black Klansman,” “Jewish Nazi,” or “white Democrat.” Sure, one expects women to be feminists, just as one should expect all living organisms to be motivated by self-interest, but there’s something downright gender-traitorous about male feminism. Self-loathing is not an attractive trait in any of God’s creatures, and these dweebs are the Benedict Arnolds of the Invisible Biological Brotherhood.

 

It only took me a cursory perusal of Google Images to get the strong suspicion that most males get into feminism for the same reason that females do: because they are failures at embodying their gender’s most attractive traits. In other words, females become feminists because they’re failures as women, while men do it because they’re failures as men.


http://takimag.com/article/feminism_as_a_mating_strategy_among_beta_males_jim_goad/print#ixzz4rKZkluwb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Shipwreck said:

Watch commercials closely.  I am pretty keyed into dumb guy husband whose poor wife has to put up with another kid or a big dumb oaf.  But lately I have been noticing that ALOT of men in commercials are skinny pant wearing sissies.  Starting to see it in mainstream, prime time commercials.  They make Pajama Boy look like Connor McGregor.  This attack on men started slowly but is picking up steam big time.

 

Howard Stern says we have to get our male leads from Australia these days cause our stars are not male enough.

 

The move to drug school boys started 2 decades ago (ritalin, adderol).    Cant have the navigate their own testosterone on their own.  Nope.   Drug em.   Its shockingly sad how many little kids and parents are buying into this.   

 

"girls try harder"

 

"girls do better in school"

 

Real quotes I have heard from sub 10 year olds.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep.  And look at all the homosexual themed TV shows and movies out there?  It's the gay-ing of society for sure.

 

18 year olds were jumping over nazi (real nazis) Europe in the 40's in the dark of night out of planes with basic parachutes and a machine gun.  

 

Can you imagine 18 year olds today having to do that if there was a war?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Maine Guide said:

Yep.  And look at all the homosexual themed TV shows and movies out there?  It's the gay-ing of society for sure.

 

18 year olds were jumping over nazi (real nazis) Europe in the 40's in the dark of night out of planes with basic parachutes and a machine gun.  

 

Can you imagine 18 year olds today having to do that if there was a war?

Most of those boys were men already, farm boys, or city boys. A rough and tough, no living in mom's basement days. You worked, or starved.

We have gotton so soft. Less than a 100 years ago, most of the people were still pooping outside.

Ever since we moved to the comfort of going indoors, and just having it disappear, we have gotten soft.

Now, TV, Video games, computers, why move. A kid can get all the stimulation he needs right from a screen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dena said:

Most of those boys were men already, farm boys, or city boys. A rough and tough, no living in mom's basement days. You worked, or starved.

We have gotton so soft. Less than a 100 years ago, most of the people were still pooping outside.

Ever since we moved to the comfort of going indoors, and just having it disappear, we have gotten soft.

Now, TV, Video games, computers, why move. A kid can get all the stimulation he needs right from a screen.

Exactly.  Imagine 20 years from now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 55555s said:

 

The move to drug school boys started 2 decades ago (ritalin, adderol).    Cant have the navigate their own testosterone on their own.  Nope.   Drug em.   Its shockingly sad how many little kids and parents are buying into this.   

 

"girls try harder"

 

"girls do better in school"

 

Real quotes I have heard from sub 10 year olds.  

 

 

Sad but this may have been the single worst thing we have done to our society.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.