flyangler

COLLUSION: Lynch USED FAKE NAME IN EMAILS (was -WJC-Comey-WaPo Nexus)

Rate this topic

20 posts in this topic

Comey denied there were any record available, NOW we find out otherwise.

Evidence that Lynch-Clinton meeting was planned in advance, not adhoc. What did they discuss in a pre-planned meeting? Grandchildren?

Oh boy, can we say "collusion" between Clinton Campaign and the sitting AG at the time? 

And there is potential collusion between the WaPo, Lynch and FBI to suppress coverage.

Where is the special counsel to investigate of THIS case of collusion?

 

 

Edited by tomkaz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Dems got their man Mueller and his sycophant investigators.

The Repubs are now morally justified to request and get one of their own.

May I suggest Jason Chaffetz be approached?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not only that Tom, but the DOJ finally released a few documents to Judicial Watch about the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting.

JW says they were so thoroughly redacted that they were meaningless, leaving on the table the 10K question:

If this meeting was just an informal, happenstance chat about grandchildren, then why all the ******* black ink?

 

Edited by Wigeon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, fish'nmagician said:

why DID he quit?

He got tired of being stonewalled by DOJ in his investigations. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, J said:

He got tired of being stonewalled by DOJ in his investigations. 

 

But as a Special Prosecutor with a less combative DOJ and AG, he could really get to the perps.

Was his resignation a foil to ultimately take this role.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only state the facts as he presented them.

I'm in no position to attempt figuring out what hairbrained schemes are floating around in heads of the Left as I deal in factual stuff rather than the "what-ifs" put out by the lunatic left. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, J said:

I can only state the facts as he presented them.

facts....

LOL

ok.

didn't he quit after Trump was elected?

which would make the reason you cited seem like rubish... but if you want to accept it as fact, ok.

maybe he was pushed out by the Deep State?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the ACLJ, the American Center for Law and Justice: 

Comey FBI Lied, Media Collusion and Illegality
By Jordan Sekulow 17 hrs. ago

We have just obtained hundreds of pages in our ongoing investigation and federal lawsuit on former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton while the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI had an ongoing criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails. The results are shocking.

First, the Comey FBI lied to us. Last July, we sent FOIA requests to both the Comey FBI and the Lynch DOJ asking for any documents related to the Clinton Lynch plane meeting. The FBI, under the then directorship of James Comey, quickly replied that “No records responsive to your request were located.”

The documents we received today from the Department of Justice include several emails from the FBI to DOJ officials concerning the meeting.  One with the subject line “FLAG” was correspondence between FBI officials (Richard Quinn, FBI Media/Investigative Publicity, and Michael Kortan) and DOJ officials concerning “flag[ing] a story . . . about a casual, unscheduled meeting between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” The DOJ official instructs the FBI to “let me know if you get any questions about this” and provides “[o]ur talkers [DOJ talking points] on this”. The talking points, however are redacted.

Another email to the FBI contains the subject line “security details coordinate between Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton?”

On July 1, 2016 – just days before our FOIA request – a DOJ email chain under the subject line, “FBI just called,” indicates that the “FBI . . . is looking for guidance” in responding to media inquiries about news reports that the FBI had prevented the press from taking pictures of the Clinton Lynch meeting. The discussion then went off email to several phone calls (of which we are not able to obtain records). An hour later, Carolyn Pokomy of the Office of the Attorney General stated, “I will let Rybicki know.” Jim Rybicki was the Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor to FBI Director Jim Comey. The information that was to be provided to Rybicki is redacted.

Also of note several of the documents contain redactions that are requested “per FBI.”

It is clear that there were multiple records within the FBI responsive to our request and that discussions regarding the surreptitious meeting between then AG Lynch and the husband of the subject of an ongoing FBI criminal investigation reached the highest levels of the FBI.

However, on October 21, 2016, the Comey FBI replied to our legal demands that “No records responsive to your request were located.”  This is in direct contravention to the law, and we are preparing further legal action to force the FBI to come clean and turn over ALL documents related to this matter to us in a timely manner.

Second, the hundreds of pages of (heavily redacted – more on that below) documents paint a clear picture of a DOJ in crisis mode as the news broke of Attorney General Lynch’s meeting with former President Clinton. In fact, the records appear to indicate that the Attorney General’s spin team immediately began preparing talking points for the Attorney General regarding the meeting BEFORE ever speaking with the AG about the matter.

Third, there is clear evidence that the main stream media was colluding with the DOJ to bury the story. A Washington Post reporter, speaking of the Clinton Lynch meeting story, said, “I’m hoping I can put it to rest .” The same Washington Post reporter, interacting with the DOJ spin team, implemented specific DOJ requests to change his story to make the Attorney General appear in a more favorable light. A New York Times reporter apologetically told the Obama DOJ that he was being “pressed into service” to have to cover the story. As the story was breaking, DOJ press officials stated, “I also talked to the ABC producer, who noted that they aren’t interested, even if Fox runs with it.”

Two days after the meeting, DOJ officials in a chain of emails that includes emails to Attorney General Lynch herself stated that the media coverage of the meeting “looks like all or most are FOX” and that “CBS . . . just says a few lines about the meeting.”

Fourth, DOJ bureaucrats have redacted all the talking points, discussions of talking points, a statement on the meeting that was apparently never delivered because there was not enough media coverage on the meeting, and its substantive discussions with the FBI on the matter. They absurdly claim the “deliberative process exemption” to FOIA, which is only supposed to apply to agency rulemaking processes.

Discussions about Attorney General Lynch’s ethically questionable meeting with former President Clinton during her investigation into Hillary Clinton clearly has nothing to do with any rule making process. We will be taking these redactions back to federal court. The law is on our side. We will keep pressing on with our investigation of former Attorney General Lynch until we get to the bottom of this.

We will also keep you informed as our litigation continues.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, tomkaz said:

From the ACLJ, the American Center for Law and Justice: 

Comey FBI Lied, Media Collusion and Illegality
By Jordan Sekulow 17 hrs. ago
.

We will also keep you informed as our litigation continues.

 

This is no longer smoke, it is developing into a full blown inferno that hopefully will burn away the layers of subterfuge that have covered this affair and others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the bigger it grows, the more the Left/Media/Dems will have to make more of the other "stories" that are out there. They have to fill pages/screens/minutes with something, anything, other than this emerging scandal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will post separately on this but it is getting curiouser and curiouser for a discussion of grandkids. UK Daily Mail:

 

Loretta Lynch used secret email account in bogus name of 'Elizabeth Carlisle' for messages about meeting with Bill Clinton during Hillary probe

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.