jimmy z

The Enemy

Rate this topic

75 posts in this topic

Is finally out in the open. Thanks to our President the enemy within has come out into the open. Shame on this UN-American activity  from some of our media. Shame on them. Their good counterparts should be angry that the Liberal media has become detrimental.

Would you please list some specific examples?

 

I'd like to know if we're talking about the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as long as you are serious, I am sure now everyone will listen.  

 

The media, in conjunction with the journalism schools, have more than earned the level of distrust they are enjoying.  Fake news and propaganda aside, the real problem has been selective bias as to what is reported, and then editorializing as to how it is 'reported'.  

 

Shame on them, and I am glad they are getting some attention for it now.

 

They cultivated this for a looooong time.   

 

Seriously.  

 

George Soros is constantly pouring millions of dollars into major news outlets just as he did to the DNC and the Clinton campaign. This Nazi, communist, whatever he is heavily influences the media.

 

https://www.mrc.org/commentary/over-30-major-news-organizations-linked-george-soros

Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros
 
 

First of Four Parts

When liberal investor George Soros gave $1.8 million to National Public Radio, it became part of the firestorm of controversy that jeopardized NPR's federal funding. But that gift only hints at the widespread influence the controversial billionaire has on the mainstream media. Soros, who spent $27 million trying to defeat President Bush in 2004, has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets - including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC.

Prominent journalists like ABC's Christiane Amanpour and former Washington Post editor and now Vice President Len Downie serve on boards of operations that take Soros cash. This despite the Society of Professional Journalist's ethical code stating: "avoid all conflicts real or perceived."

This information is part of an upcoming report by the Media Research Centers Business & Media Institute which has been looking into George Soros and his influence on the media.

The investigative reporting start-up ProPublica is a prime example. ProPublica, which recently won its second Pulitzer Prize, initially was given millions of dollars from the Sandler Foundation to "strengthen the progressive infrastructure" - "progressive" the code for very liberal. In 2010, it also received a two-year contribution of $125,000 each year from the Open Society Foundations. In case you wonder where that money comes from, the OSF website is www.soros.org. It is a network of more than 30 international foundations, mostly funded by Soros, who has contributed more than $8 billion to those efforts.

The ProPublica stories are thoroughly researched by top-notch staffers who used to work at some of the biggest news outlets in the nation. But the topics are almost laughably left-wing. The site's proud list of "Our Investigations" includes attacks on oil companies, gas companies, the health care industry, for-profit schools and more. More than 100 stories on the latest lefty cause: opposition to drilling for natural gas by hydraulic fracking. Another 100 on the evils of the foreclosure industry.

Throw in a couple investigations making the military look bad and another about prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and you have almost the perfect journalism fantasy - a huge budget, lots of major media partners and a liberal agenda unconstrained by advertising.

One more thing: a 14-person Journalism Advisory Board, stacked with CNN's David Gergen and representatives from top newspapers, a former publisher of The Wall Street Journal and the editor-in-chief of Simon & Schuster. Several are working journalists, including:

  • Jill Abramson, a managing editor of The New York Times;
  • Martin D. Baron, the editor of The Boston Globe;
  • David Boardman, the executive editor of the Seattle Times;
  • Kerry Smith, the senior vice president for editorial quality of ABC News;
  • Cynthia A. Tucker, the editor of the editorial page of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
  • Alberto Ibargüen, the former publisher of The Miami Herald, is on the board of directors. He's also president and CEO of journalism's prestigious John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.

ProPublica is new and prominent, but it's far from the only Soros-funded organization that is stacked with members of the supposedly neutral press. The Center for Public Integrity is another great example. Its board of directors is filled with working journalists like Amanpour from ABC, right along side blatant liberal media types like Arianna Huffington, of the Huffington Post and now AOL.

Like ProPublica, the CPI board is a veritable Who's Who of journalism and top media organizations, including:

  • Christiane Amanpour - Anchor of ABC's Sunday morning political affairs program, 'This Week with Christiane Amanpour.' A reliable lefty, she has called tax cuts 'giveaways,' the Tea Party 'extreme,' and Obama 'very Reaganesque.'
  • Arianna Huffington - Co-founder of the popular left-wing website named after her, The Huffington Post, a nationally syndicated columnist, and thanks to a recent $315 million sale, the person in charge of AOL's news divisions.
  • Paula Madison - Executive vice president and chief diversity officer for NBC Universal, who leads NBC Universal's corporate diversity initiatives, spanning all broadcast television, cable, digital, and film properties.
  • Matt Thompson - Editorial product manager at National Public Radio and an adjunct faculty member at the prominent Poynter Institute.

Once again, like ProPublica, the center's investigations are mostly liberal - attacks on the coal industry, payday loans and conservatives like Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour. The Center for Public Integrity is also more open about its politics, including a detailed investigation into conservative funders David and Charles Koch and their "web of influence." According to the center's own 990 tax forms, the Open Society Institute gave it $651,650 in 2009 alone.

The well-known Center for Investigative Reporting follows the same template - important journalists on the board and a liberal editorial agenda. Both the board of directors and the advisory board contain journalists from major news outlets. The board features:

  • Phil Bronstein (President), San Francisco Chronicle;
  • David Boardman, The Seattle Times;
  • Len Downie, former Executive Editor of the Washington Post, now VP;
  • George Osterkamp, CBS News producer.

The Advisory Board features prominent liberal journalists like Bill Moyers, Seymour Hersh of The New Yorker, former '60 Minutes' host Mike Wallace, and representatives of both PBS and NPR.

Readers of the site are greeted with numerous stories on climate change, illegal immigration and the evils of big companies. It counts among its media partners The Washington Post, Salon, CNN and ABC News. CIR received close to $1 million from Open Society from 2003 to 2008.

Why does it all matter? Journalists, we are constantly told, are neutral in their reporting. In almost the same breath, many bemoan the influence of money in politics. It is a maxim of both the left and many in the media that conservatives are bought and paid for by business interests. Yet where are the concerns about where their money comes from?

Fred Brown, who recently revised the book "Journalism Ethics: A Casebook of Professional Conduct for News Media," argues journalists need to be "transparent" about their connections and "be up front about your relationship" with those who fund you.

Unfortunately, that rarely happens. While the nonprofits list who sits on their boards, the news outlets they work for make little or no effort to connect those dots. Amanpour's biography page, for instance, talks about her lengthy career, her time at CNN and her many awards. It makes no mention of her affiliation with the Center for Public Integrity.

If journalists were more up front, they would have to admit numerous uncomfortable connections with groups that push a liberal agenda, many of them funded by the stridently liberal George Soros. So don't expect that transparency any time soon.

Dan Gainor is the Boone Pickens Fellow and the Media Research Center's Vice President for Business and Culture. His column appears each week on The Fox Forum. He can also be contacted on FaceBook and Twitter as dangainor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How can the propaganda work for the agenda if people doubt the propaganda.?  How dare anyone ever question the propaganda. Free speech is only for the people that agree with the propaganda. Anything else must be hate speech or something?   It's un American to have to deal with doubt of potential lies.  Don't the lemmings that dance to the propaganda have the right to do so without the interference of doubt?

And those republicans- the nerve, they are supposed to be grateful for any coverage. They are not supposed to fight back. They're supposed to take their beatings & insults and then apologize- it's the American way. The propaganda has declared it so.

The only way to overcome this awful defensive action is to dissect every syllable, call names,exacerbate any incorrect assertion, attack & destroy with our love & tolerance with anarchy and agenda driven propaganda. If we wear them down and finally get our capitulation then we'll just dissect every syllable, call names,exacerbate any incorrect assertion, attack & destroy with our love & tolerance with anarchy and agenda driven propaganda.

Rinse & repeat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump is taking a play out of Putin's book to control the people. First. Discredit the media so you can do as you please and then reports are taken as Fake News. Problem? This isn't Russia.

 

Seriously. This guy is dangerous.

 

The media discredited themselves... Trump is simply taking advantage of the fact.

 

You guys seem to forget this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The media discredited themselves... Trump is simply taking advantage of the fact.

 

You guys seem to forget this

Trump and his surrogates lies about everything. He and they feeds the media. It's all they can write about. He's and they got the biggest chit show on earth. Now he's butt- hurt because the media calls him and them out on his and their lies. Can't believe you guys actually think the media is our enemy.

 

Truth to Power. That's the media. Only those abusing power would be afraid of the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The media never has and never will be the enemy, the bull chit they spill will always be the enemy of the intelligent.

 

You have to sift and dig deeper now for real reporting... cut through the hysteria and pontificating if you can

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

98% of ALL media & media bullhorns supporting the propaganda isn't enough. They want 100%.

 

Garriga and the rest like the "Press" just fine so long as its spooning out what they want to consume... they dont want news they want reassurance that their view is acceptable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

98% of ALL media & media bullhorns supporting the propaganda isn't enough. They want 100%.

 

And "truthiness" testing to screen opposition... anything they dont like is "hate speech" so that needs to be supressed as well.... dangerous people

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What happened to just reporting the news. Not Biased, just the facts, no comments, etc. It use to be that way, but now there is a social agenda. I don't want left nor do I want right, I just want news thats not sensationalized or biased. Someone start a new NEWS channel.

The news is no longer reported but certain agenda specific events are culled and then spun to suit a liberal bias

Trump is addressing that fact and libs are responding with feelings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you please list some specific examples?

 

I'd like to know if we're talking about the same thing.

Pretty much what CNN says about him and that NY Times thing.

Things like terrorist reports in Europe not being aired, the Kellyann thing. The White House in a disarray type news. Just false reports, selective news, stories blown out of proportion. There seems to be so much as of late. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much what CNN says about him and that NY Times thing.

Things like terrorist reports in Europe not being aired, the Kellyann thing. The White House in a disarray type news. Just false reports, selective news, stories blown out of proportion. There seems to be so much as of late.

We got a true believer of the false prophet right here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.