Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
HanoverStriper

Plovers - Globe article today

9 posts in this topic

Fences that have barred beachgoers from prime spots along the Atlantic surf may come down this summer as the federal government prepares to relax restrictions designed to protect the piping plover in Massachusetts.

 

The US Fish and Wildlife Service this week released a draft plan — the first of its kind along the East Coast — that would allow state and local beach officials far more flexibility in managing the increasing number of the sand-colored birds that have taken up residence on shores along Massachusetts, often throughout the summer.

 

The plovers, which were deemed threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 1986, have riled many beachgoers, as officials in recent years fenced off increasingly large swaths of beaches from Cape Ann to Cape Cod to protect the tiny birds.

 

The draft plan, likely to be approved this summer, would grant the state a 25-year permit to allow beach managers to open roads and parking lots where some birds may roost, authorize off-road vehicles to be escorted past nests, and, in rare cases, let officials move nests from sensitive areas.

 

“This effort is vital to plover conservation,” said Meagan Racey, a spokeswoman for the US Fish and Wildlife Service. “As plover numbers increase, tensions can rise as beachgoers [and] residents seek to share the beach with the plover and other shorebirds. We are planning ahead to find a solution that works for people and plovers.”

 

When federal officials designated the region’s plovers as threatened 30 years ago, there were just 139 breeding pairs in Massachusetts. Since then, after spending $150,000 a year to help avert the extinction of the birds, the state has seen a resurgence of plovers, with an estimated 689 pairs nesting last year.

 

Over the years, federal, state, and local officials have required fencing around nests, leashes for dogs, and warning signs to alert people of their presence, among other protections. The plovers now exceed their federal goal of 625 pairs in Massachusetts.

 

Fences that have barred beachgoers from prime spots along the Atlantic surf may come down this summer as the federal government prepares to relax restrictions designed to protect the piping plover in Massachusetts.

 

The US Fish and Wildlife Service this week released a draft plan — the first of its kind along the East Coast — that would allow state and local beach officials far more flexibility in managing the increasing number of the sand-colored birds that have taken up residence on shores along Massachusetts, often throughout the summer.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

 

The plovers, which were deemed threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 1986, have riled many beachgoers, as officials in recent years fenced off increasingly large swaths of beaches from Cape Ann to Cape Cod to protect the tiny birds.

 

The draft plan, likely to be approved this summer, would grant the state a 25-year permit to allow beach managers to open roads and parking lots where some birds may roost, authorize off-road vehicles to be escorted past nests, and, in rare cases, let officials move nests from sensitive areas.

 

“This effort is vital to plover conservation,” said Meagan Racey, a spokeswoman for the US Fish and Wildlife Service. “As plover numbers increase, tensions can rise as beachgoers [and] residents seek to share the beach with the plover and other shorebirds. We are planning ahead to find a solution that works for people and plovers.”

 

When federal officials designated the region’s plovers as threatened 30 years ago, there were just 139 breeding pairs in Massachusetts. Since then, after spending $150,000 a year to help avert the extinction of the birds, the state has seen a resurgence of plovers, with an estimated 689 pairs nesting last year.

 

Over the years, federal, state, and local officials have required fencing around nests, leashes for dogs, and warning signs to alert people of their presence, among other protections. The plovers now exceed their federal goal of 625 pairs in Massachusetts.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

 

“We are hopeful and optimistic that this plan will allow us more flexibility at beaches across the state this summer,” said Jon Regosin, chief of conservation science at the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife.

 

If federal officials approve the plan, beach managers would have to seek Regosin’s permission before allowing vehicles on beaches or other activity that is now prohibited to protect the plovers.

 

“This can help reduce tensions,” Regosin said. “It allows for much more of a cooperative approach.”

 

 

While plovers have rebounded in Massachusetts, they continue to struggle to survive along much of the Atlantic coast, where there is often limited protection from predators, such as gulls and skunks. They also struggle to raise chicks on beaches subject to erosion; narrower shores mean less sand for camouflage and more eggs washed out to sea.

 

From North Carolina to Eastern Canada, there were an estimated 1,866 plover pairs in 2015 — down about 1 percent from their high in 2007 and well below federal goals for the region. The Fish and Wildlife Service won’t consider removing the birds from federal protection under the Endangered Species Act until they maintain a population of 2,000 pairs for more than five years along the East Coast, among other signs of revival.

 

Environmental groups that have worked with state officials to protect plovers in Massachusetts say they expect that easing the restrictions under the proposed habitat conservation plan would ultimately reduce stress on the birds.

 

The plan, they added, would also direct more federal money toward protecting the plovers from predators, noting that the state’s main effort now is going toward increasing the number of chicks that survive after they’re born.

 

In recent years, fewer chicks have lived long enough for their parents to teach them to fly and survive on their own, said Katharine C. Parsons, director of Mass Audubon’s coastal waterbird program. For the plover population to remain sustainable, about 1.24 chicks per brood should survive; today, an average of fewer than one of the chicks survives in Massachusetts.

 

Plovers usually lay four eggs.

 

“We still need to do more to improve their productivity,” she said. “But we’re optimistic about this plan. We see it is a win-win — for the birds and the people.”

 

As the number of plovers has increased on crowded shores such as Revere Beach, where at least 16 plover pairs took up residence last summer, officials have sought to reduce the anger of beachgoers, many of whom have complained about fencing that covered 15 percent of the beach at high tide.

 

They have made the enclosures less obtrusive, using fiberglass rods and blue signs, which they say blend in better. They have also sought to educate the public, rather than threaten them with fines for disturbing the nests.

 

In Orleans, after years of losing hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in fees for stickers to drive on town beaches, local officials independently sought and obtained a federal waiver last year to allow a limited number of vehicles back on the beach.

 

There were strict rules about when and where the vehicles could go, how fast they could travel, and how they would be monitored and escorted.

 

“It did a lot to tamp down tensions,” said John Hodgson, a town selectman and chairman of the Orleans Parks Commission.

 

He said the town’s experience provides a model for what other communities could do under the proposed federal plan. “This would be a huge win for the state,” he said.

 

For Russ Hopping, who oversees about 27 miles of beaches from Ipswich to Nantucket for the Trustees of Reservations, a federal waiver would mean more than getting rid of some fences on their beaches. It would mean fewer headaches.

 

With some 60 plover pairs on their beaches last summer, Hopping hopes new flexibility would translate into fewer complaints and greater protection for the birds.

 

“That we’ve reached the point that this opportunity even exists represents a conservation success story for Massachusetts,” he said.

 

David Abel can be reached at dabel@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @davabel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're putting a positive spin on it, and it may help in some places.

 

But it also allows for some really draconian measures to protect shorebirds ( and not just Plovers).

 

We'll see how this all pans out...... but I think some will be wishing for the good old days before long.

 

The lot at West Dennis Beach may be open, but Hatches may be closed all summer or permanently, and the backside closed all fall as the shorebirds migrate through.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Thanks for the heads up Hanover. I hate to be a skeptic but I am. I'm a non-believer and think this is all a bunch of double talkin jive rederick. You'll still be harassed by some bird loving twinkie filled with rage as you try to throw your waders on or launch a kayak at a favorite beach. "The plovers, which were deemed threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 1986, have riled many beachgoers, as officials in recent years fenced off increasingly large swaths of beaches from Cape Ann to Cape Cod to protect the tiny birds........Fences that have barred beachgoers from prime spots along the Atlantic surf may come down this summer as the federal government prepares to relax restrictions designed to protect the piping plover in Massachusetts."

Double talking liars. 1986. Hooey I tell ya.

Edited by flylikabird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

"Since then, after spending >>>$150,000 a year to help avert the extinction of the birds, the state has seen a resurgence of plovers, with an estimated 689 pairs nesting last year."

 

This is true but very misleading. The **STATE may have spent 150 grand a year, but individual towns spent far more. Just a couple years ago the Globe did another article on the plovers.

 

 

"....other birds runs to $92,000. The nonprofit Duxbury Beach Reservation also doesn’t itemize plover costs, but it spent nearly $150,000 last year on “endangered species management,” according to its annual report.

 

At a time when cash-strapped communities are eyeing budget cuts for human programs, the plovers continue to do pretty well.

 

***To protect its population of around 40 plovers and their chicks, it spent $245,000.*** (“That is a big-ass number,” exclaimed Plymouth town manager Mark Stankiewicz upon seeing the plover budget for the first time. “I never would have thought it would be that much.”)"

 

I love wildlife... but honestly? I effing hate that bird

Edited by rst3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the new sand placed on Sandwich beaches was frozen in place and should do fine , but who knows the forces of Mother nature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for wildlife conservation but this is ridiculous. ***To protect its population of around 40 plovers and their chicks, it spent $245,000.*** That money should've been sent to The Jimmy Fund instead. We need to eradicate Cancer and the homeless epidemic, more than these little Chickadees. I mean Plovers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One the Feds get a hold of something, they'll never let go, in the face of all logic to the contrary. I was frankly amazed when they finally killed the Atlantic Salmon restoration program, figured it would go on on forever, beyond all reason. There was actually more reason to keep that program going, because of its beneficial side effects, than this idiotic gooney bird exercise.

 

-bd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.