Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

It won't go away.

Rate this topic

12 posts in this topic

This birther thing just won't go away, no matter how bad some folks want it to.

Now a state court, Georgia, has a new law that says that a candidate for Federal, or statewide office must prove citizenship in the good ol US of A to appear on a state ballot. A judge has upheld the law, despite our President's legal wrangling.

Will the President flash the BC that he released last year, and subject that document to legal scrutiny?

Why fight the Georgia law in court? Save money and time, and show your proof of citizenship, isn't that what most folks would do?

Maybe he is so confident of victory he will just concede Georgia and its 15 electoral votes?




Birthers Hail Judge’s Decision That Could “Depose” Obama


Ruling denies Obama’s attempt to have complaint that seeks to strike President from Georgia ballot dismissed


Paul Joseph Watson


Wednesday, January 4, 2012


Birthers are hailing a decision by a judge in Georgia that could see Barack Obama struck from the presidential state ballot if Obama fails to prove that he fulfils the 'natural born citizen’ constitutional requirement to be President.


“Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi in the Office of State Administrative Hearings denied a motion by Obama asking to dismiss the complaint that seeks to keep his name off the state ballot during the March presidential primary. The judge’s decision now sets the stage for a Jan. 26 hearing on the issue in Fulton County,” reports the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer.


The complaint was originally filed by Orly Taitz on behalf of a Georgia resident. Taitz, a prominent 'birther’ who previously represented two soldiers who refused to deploy to Afghanistan over their doubts that Obama is a natural born U.S. citizen and therefore ineligible to be commander in chief, lauded the judge’s ruling.


“I can now depose Obama and everybody else (i)nvolved without any impediment,” the California attorney posted on her website.


Taitz, along with several other Georgia residents, will now be able to present their evidence that Obama was not born in the United States in a court of law – unless the ruling is overturned on appeal before January 26.


The case, Farrar v Obama, was also brought by J. Mark Hatfield, a Republican state representative who last year failed to pass a bill that would have required presidential candidates to submit proof of qualifications.


A d v e r t i s e m e n t


“The Georgia Election Code (the “Code”) mandates that “[e]very candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought,” stated the ruling in response to President Obama’s attempt to have the case dismissed.


Despite the White House being forced to release a purported copy of Obama’s birth certificate last year, the controversy has yet to completely die down.


One time Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump repeatedly raised questions surrounding Obama’s background during the spring of 2011 before going cold on the issue, a move prominent 'birther’ and author Jerome Corsi claimed was an organized political stunt to neutralize the issue.


The release of Corsi’s best-selling book, Where’s the Birth Certificate?, coincided with the White House deciding to release Obama’s alleged long form birth certificate. Corsi points to evidence that the document is a forgery created using modern computer techniques and has numerous discrepancies with a genuine 1961 birth certificate created by a typewriter.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a really funny part to the story



that trump was in on a stunt to quiet the birthers when he shut up when the copy was released.




you can't make this stuff up folks









Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
the one that was proven fake within one day by a teenager? yeah hillarious. we have foreigners declaring themselves king.


and trump is in on it




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

A judge is a judge.


Does weather a judge is appointed or elected have any bearing on why our President chose to appeal the decision instead of proving his citizenship?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to register here in order to participate.

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.