Jump to content

Stray Dog

BST Users
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Converted

  • Interests (Hobbies, favorite activities, etc.):
    Fishing, Photography
  • What I do for a living:
    Business Consultant

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This is a very bad picture that had to manipulate to create something like this: My friend George again. Is it me or is it a photographer's curse not to be in any picture?
  2. If i understand your question right...Every picture is unique. The sensor "digitizes" what it sees. Check this out: First pic an empty wall. Original size 2.75MB Second pic some plant. Original size 4.61MB I took both of them with the same D60 10MP camera. So even though two same size pictures look the same the actual detail captured from the sensor of the camera never is. The more complex the image the larger the file. That is if you resize the two images with the same parameters. P.S. sorry about my cr@ppy English....
  3. It is everywhere. All digital cameras produce it. Some more and some less. Furthermore any post processing we do is just making things worse. A lot worse. I use Paint Shop Pro for my PP and it has a wonderful NR tool that i use AFTER all the other changes i make (exposure, sharpening e.c.t.). Since now it's working fine (depending on the original noise of the pic) but it is wise? Is it better to apply the NR filter to another stage of the PP?
  4. Definitely the first one for me. At the second pic you don't have more detail. You have more image. If you wanna make small adjustments better use the exposure compensation function on your camera. This will give you a good +/- 2 steps and make the difference.
×
×
  • Create New...