TimS Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Which is worse/less accurate/dishonest/not factually supported: A: I know Republicans are dishonest America haters, but helping pedophiles molest children is something we can't accept B: The dialogue to decriminalize pedophilia has already started. It's in it's infancy (no pun intended) but it's picking up steam and as liberals begin to look for their next perversion to normalize. Amazing how people think these two thread opening statements are exactly the same - unbelievable even - what it must take to convince yourself that these are equal? Holy ****, that's frightening. TimS (*edited - I added the rest of the opening statement so Frank's butt can stop hurting. TimS) Show someone how to catch striped bass and they'll be ready to fish anywhere. Show someone where to go striped bass fishing and you'll have a desperate report chaser with loose lips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnmagician Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 TOO FUNNY, AND YOU ACCUSED ME OF TAKING THINGS OUT OF CONTEXT, YOU LEFT OFF A PRETTY DAMNING PORTION OF RW'S POST. SAD DAY. Eggy 10-13 LAA 7-14 50-50 2-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Both are equally dishonest and unsupported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnmagician Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 but it's picking up steam and as liberals begin to look for their next perversion to normalize. I don't even want to know what's next on their list after this one. Eggy 10-13 LAA 7-14 50-50 2-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnmagician Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Dude's post seems MUCH WORSE when you leave off half of what RW's OP stated. Eggy 10-13 LAA 7-14 50-50 2-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Williams Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Both are equally dishonest and unsupported. Nonsense. The dialogue to destigmatize and portray "Minor Attracted Persons" as a new sort of "normal" just like homosexual orientation is a new sort of "normal" has already started and I cited numerous articles supporting that. B4U-ACT is one of the groups trying to spearhead that and the very fact that we're seeing "minor attracted persons" being used instead of pedophiles is prima facie evidence of the push for destigmatization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnmagician Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 you realize that IN CONTEXT "next on their list after this one" means this one is on their list, and the "this one" referred to is decriminalizing and normalizing pedophilia. Tim IN CONTEXT what has RW said about liberals. Eggy 10-13 LAA 7-14 50-50 2-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Both are equally dishonest and unsupported. Nonsense. The dialogue to destigmatize and portray "Minor Attracted Persons" as a new sort of "normal" just like homosexual orientation is a new sort of "normal" has already started and I cited numerous articles supporting that. B4U-ACT is one of the groups trying to spearhead that and the very fact that we're seeing "minor attracted persons" being used instead of pedophiles is prima facie evidence of the push for destigmatization. Your post didn't say destigmatization. It said decriminalization. No one is seeking to decriminalize pedophilia. It's not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonbat Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Neither one is factually honest. The article in question makes no such statement that I am aware of. "My brain hurts!" - Mr. Gumby "Then it will have to come out!" - The Brain Specialist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiverRaider Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 So Frank assigned a position to RW... and now he's indignant about RW's position... that he assigned to him Wow A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. – William James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcow? Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 TimS Pass summary judgement and let the chips fall where they may. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishnmagician Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Quote:Originally Posted by The Dude Your post didn't say destigmatization. It said decriminalization. No one is seeking to decriminalize pedophilia. It's not happening. I'd like to know what portion of libs want to destigmatize it too. I support a **** getting mental help prior to committing a crime against a child. but having those impulses SHOULD stigmatize someone. If I knew someone had those impulses I would never let them around any kids that I knew, even if they never acted on them. Eggy 10-13 LAA 7-14 50-50 2-15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishinambition Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Who are the people who want it destigmatized and are they liberals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BT758 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 par·o·dy ˈperədē/noun noun: parody; plural noun: parodies 1. an imitation of the style of a particular writer, artist, or genre with deliberate exaggeration for comic effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiverRaider Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 Who are the people who want it destigmatized and are they liberals? I just assumed.... it is a fairly liberal concept is it not? A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. – William James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to register here in order to participate.
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now