Jump to content


Photo

Parabolic skis vs. Old school


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#1 Crazyotto

Crazyotto
  • 1,000 Post Club!

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,393 posts
  • Joined: Feb-28 2002

Posted December 18 2008 - 2:59 PM

Man, have things changed since I last hit the slopes 15yrs ago. I'm checking out new ski equipment and the skis are nothing like the ones I used. Are the parabolic skis that much better than my long boards? I used to bomb Outer Limits up at Killington when I was younger. Now, I'm just looking to cruise the blue squares. I have a pair of 210cm Olin slalom skis with one trip on them. Looks like I'll be renting some to see what they are like.


"Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile"

#2 fish-bum

fish-bum
  • Senior Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 242 posts
  • Joined: Dec-28 2003

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:06 PM

Definitely rent - you'll want to dump the long boards. With the parabolics (shaped) skis they turn easier, and you also can use a shorter ski so they turn quicker. You'll like them.



#3 titleguy

titleguy
  • Way too many!

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,095 posts
  • Joined: May-02 2008

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:08 PM

Save the 210s for that 70s party at Bear Mountain. The new skis are a lot of fun- power steering. I went from 212 GS skis in 1994 to 174 all mountains now with some stops in between. I'm looking at some 168 Rossi Z11s right now. Waaaaay too much fun. Hint though- because of the shape of the ski- they like to be an edge, always... If you try "bombing" Outer Limits on shaped skis, you can post from the Rutland Regional Medical Center.


Uva, Uvam, vivendo varia fit....  Augustus McCrae.


#4 FenderBender

FenderBender
  • 1,000 Post Club!

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,562 posts
  • Joined: Dec-08 2000

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:08 PM

Once you go parabolic you may never go back. They offer a lot more control with a lot less effort in a much shorter ski. I went from 195cm on my conventionals to 180cm on the bolics with same results for cruising, but don't like 'em on the steeps. A little too precise for me. I still use my older K2 slabs for the diamonds.


"All people have the right to stupidity but some abuse the privilege" wink.gif

#5 mcafam

mcafam
  • Senior Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 359 posts
  • Joined: Jul-13 2008

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:09 PM

They'll most likely have you drop a size or two with parabollics. My wife says they're not much different. I rented the last year I skied and really didn't notice a difference from my old rossi's. You aren't supposed to ski with them together, rather spread apart a bit. I do miss it. (bad knees and feet) Have a good time.



#6 Cabo2005

Cabo2005
  • 5,000 Post Club!

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,761 posts
  • Joined: Apr-17 2006

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:13 PM

You will probably drop more than one size. They are a blast and you do not need the length. I used to do the Killington thing lots as my parents lived in that neck of the woods. I used the new skis at Grand Targee out in Idaho. Lots of fun and great snow.
Cabo



#7 Wayne Tj

Wayne Tj
  • Way too many!

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,968 posts
  • Joined: Nov-10 2000
  • LocationGitland, NY

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:27 PM

I too got back into skiing after a 15 year hiatus. In the basement were my 215 cm Dynastar skis and Salomon rear entry boots. I skied the whole mountain with these, including the Outerlimits, double black diamonds, you name it.

I took them into the ski shop to get them tuned and have the bindings checked out. The guy working there, whom I knew, said to leave them at home and try a pair of K2 Recon in 177 cm. So I bought a pair on Tecnica Diablo boots and hit Okema with the kids.

I was very skeptical that these short skis would be stable enough a high speeds and hold an edge in hard packed snow. Boy, was I wrong – they were great! I bought a pair last April, at the end of the season, for ½ price. I can’t wait to use them in two weeks.

Demo a good pair of parabolics and you won’t want to use your old boards.


.
.
.
I'll take God and guns, you can keep Obama.

#8 GaryK

GaryK
  • 1,000 Post Club!

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,669 posts
  • Joined: Dec-16 1999

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:36 PM

There is definitly a difference between old boards and the new shaped skis (parabollic lol).

I too used to ski on 205-208 and now am on a 175 for slalom and 181 for GS. In the old days almost 100% of your weight was on the down hill ski, now with shaped skis you put a bit more weight on the the other ski...like 70-30%. The new side cut allows for more complete turns, even at higher speeds.

Picking up a new pair of race stock atomic GS skis tonight. Getting them for free (normally $1100) cause I busted mine last season in a race, and Atomic replaced them for zip .

sweeeeeetttttt!!!!!!!! I just hope I can use them this year cause my accident.



#9 big popper

big popper
  • 5,000 Post Club!

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,538 posts
  • Joined: Sep-21 2006
  • LocationOCEAN STATE

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:39 PM

4 get about it. get a snowboard. Lets Ride.



#10 fish-bum

fish-bum
  • Senior Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 242 posts
  • Joined: Dec-28 2003

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:41 PM

4 get about it. get a snowboard. Lets Ride.

Why handicap yourself like that?



#11 GaryK

GaryK
  • 1,000 Post Club!

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,669 posts
  • Joined: Dec-16 1999

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:44 PM

Why handicap yourself like that?


good one!



#12 titleguy

titleguy
  • Way too many!

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,095 posts
  • Joined: May-02 2008

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:45 PM

Why handicap yourself like that?


Here, Here...

The difference in technology over the years is remarkable. Not only have thes skis changed dramatically, but boots have as well. Fore and aft stiffness is much less of a factor than lateral stability that is required to push and hold the ski from edge to edge. Once you hit the "sweet spot" on shaped skis you will know it- you're pulling Gs.


Uva, Uvam, vivendo varia fit....  Augustus McCrae.


#13 big popper

big popper
  • 5,000 Post Club!

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,538 posts
  • Joined: Sep-21 2006
  • LocationOCEAN STATE

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:48 PM

Dam skiers.



#14 GaryK

GaryK
  • 1,000 Post Club!

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,669 posts
  • Joined: Dec-16 1999

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:48 PM

Here, Here...

The difference in technology over the years is remarkable. Not only have thes skis changed dramatically, but boots have as well. Fore and aft stiffness is much less of a factor than lateral stability that is required to push and hold the ski from edge to edge. Once you hit the "sweet spot" on shaped skis you will know it- you're pulling Gs.


you know it man...!!!

The oldest daughter pulling Gs at the eastern alpine championships last year.




#15 Triet

Triet
  • Way too many!

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,666 posts
  • Joined: Mar-19 2001

Posted December 18 2008 - 3:49 PM

If you are just looking to cruise blues, and you are a decent skier, do what I do, ditch the skis. I rock snowblades. They are about 2' long, and can go 90% of the places you can go on a ski, with less effort. Perfect for the groomed, manmade "snow" in the East. Stick em under your chair in the lodge. So much easier to manage in a ****hole like Killington.


Your boy is going to be a big flop in Washington, and I can't wait till it happens.-Rocky Rhodes
Mccain is weak, lame and a poor choice for President-JimP