Yo, dena! I think this is important, please please try to consider it fairly. It doesn't have to mean that at all, about actual knowing collusion. It never did to me, anyways. They are two entirely different questions, as I see it. #1 is whether Russia actively did things to influence the last election (forget about whether they possibly influenced the outcome; that's long over and I question whether anybody could prove that, statistically (as a science/engineering guy, I question whether anybody could prove otherwise statistically). #2 is whether there was specific, knowing collusion between Russia and Trump.
I think what Trump did today is mostly reject #1 because of #2. Whadda you think bout dat?
But the main point remains...they're different, separate questions. P.S...please respond to me, not like you're responding to the DNC or Hillary or something.